mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FLAME: Taming Backdoors in Federated Learning (Extended Version 1)

arXiv 2101.02281 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2021cs.CRcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative machine learning approach allowing participants to jointly train a model without having to share their private, potentially sensitive local datasets with others. Despite its benefits, FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, in which an adversary injects manipulated model updates into the model aggregation process so that the resulting model will provide targeted false predictions for specific adversary-chosen inputs. Proposed defenses against backdoor attacks based on detecting and filtering out malicious model updates consider only very specific and limited attacker models, whereas defenses based on differential privacy-inspired noise injection significantly deteriorate the benign performance of the aggregated model. To address these deficiencies, we introduce FLAME, a defense framework that estimates the sufficient amount of noise to be injected to ensure the elimination of backdoors while maintaining the model performance. To minimize the required amount of noise, FLAME uses a model clustering and weight clipping approach. Our evaluation of FLAME on several datasets stemming from application areas including image classification, word prediction, and IoT intrusion detection demonstrates that FLAME removes backdoors effectively with a negligible impact on the benign performance of the models. Furthermore, following the considerable attention that our research has received after its presentation at USENIX SEC 2022, FLAME has become the subject of numerous investigations proposing diverse attack methodologies in an attempt to circumvent it. As a response to these endeavors, we provide a comprehensive analysis of these attempts. Our findings show that these papers (e.g., 3DFed [36]) have not fully comprehended nor correctly employed the fundamental principles underlying FLAME, i.e., our defense mechanism effectively repels these attempted attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 8; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Concealing Backdoor Model Updates in Federated Learning by Trigger-Optimized Data Poisoning
  2. 2025BackFed: An Efficient & Standardized Benchmark Suite for Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
  3. 2023Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: Survey, Challenges and Future Research Directions
  4. 2024DeTrigger: A Gradient-Centric Approach to Backdoor Attack Mitigation in Federated Learning
  5. 2025FedBAP: Backdoor Defense via Benign Adversarial Perturbation in Federated Learning
  6. 2024Client-Side Patching against Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
  7. 2023On the Vulnerability of Backdoor Defenses for Federated Learning
  8. 2023Mitigating Backdoors in Federated Learning with FLD