Structure-Aware Distributed Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While federated learning protects data privacy, it also makes the model update process vulnerable to long-term stealthy perturbations. Existing studies on backdoor attacks in federated learning mainly focus on trigger design or poisoning strategies, typically assuming that identical perturbations behave similarly across different model architectures. This assumption overlooks the impact of model structure on perturbation effectiveness. From a structure-aware perspective, this paper analyzes the coupling relationship between model architectures and backdoor perturbations. We introduce two metrics, Structural Responsiveness Score (SRS) and Structural Compatibility Coefficient (SCC), to measure a model's sensitivity to perturbations and its preference for fractal perturbations. Based on these metrics, we develop a structure-aware fractal perturbation injection framework (TFI) to study the role of architectural properties in the backdoor injection process. Experimental results show that model architecture significantly influences the propagation and aggregation of perturbations. Networks with multi-path feature fusion can amplify and retain fractal perturbations even under low poisoning ratios, while models with low structural compatibility constrain their effectiveness. Further analysis reveals a strong correlation between SCC and attack success rate, suggesting that SCC can predict perturbation survivability. These findings highlight that backdoor behaviors in federated learning depend not only on perturbation design or poisoning intensity but also on the interaction between model architecture and aggregation mechanisms, offering new insights for structure-aware defense design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2026.
Builds on
12 of 32 references.
References · 12
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 484
- 2023Recent Advances on Federated Learning: A Systematic Surveycited by 41
- 2021FLAME: Taming Backdoors in Federated Learning (Extended Version 1)cited by 16
- 2024DeTrigger: A Gradient-Centric Approach to Backdoor Attack Mitigation in Federated Learningcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Unveiling Hidden Threats: Using Fractal Triggers to Boost Stealthiness of Distributed Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
- 2026Revisiting Backdoor Threat in Federated Instruction Tuning from a Signal Aggregation Perspective
- 2025SPA: Towards More Stealth and Persistent Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
- 2026FAROS: Robust Federated Learning with Adaptive Scaling against Backdoor Attacks
- 2023Backdoor Attacks in Peer-to-Peer Federated Learning
- 2026Backdoors Leave Structural Traces: FedMAST for Backdoor Detection and Containment in Federated Learning
- 2025FedBAP: Backdoor Defense via Benign Adversarial Perturbation in Federated Learning
- 2022Invariant Aggregator for Defending against Federated Backdoor Attacks