STDLens: Model Hijacking-Resilient Federated Learning for Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has been gaining popularity as a collaborative learning framework to train deep learning-based object detection models over a distributed population of clients. Despite its advantages, FL is vulnerable to model hijacking. The attacker can control how the object detection system should misbehave by implanting Trojaned gradients using only a small number of compromised clients in the collaborative learning process. This paper introduces STDLens, a principled approach to safeguarding FL against such attacks. We first investigate existing mitigation mechanisms and analyze their failures caused by the inherent errors in spatial clustering analysis on gradients. Based on the insights, we introduce a three-tier forensic framework to identify and expel Trojaned gradients and reclaim the performance over the course of FL. We consider three types of adaptive attacks and demonstrate the robustness of STDLens against advanced adversaries. Extensive experiments show that STDLens can protect FL against different model hijacking attacks and outperform existing methods in identifying and removing Trojaned gradients with significantly higher precision and much lower false-positive rates.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2023.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 250
- 2019Detecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysiscited by 192
5 more
- 2021CRFL: Certifiably Robust Federated Learning against Backdoor Attackscited by 91
- 2021FLOP: Federated Learning on Medical Datasets using Partial Networkscited by 42
- 2021FLAME: Taming Backdoors in Federated Learning (Extended Version 1)cited by 16
- 2021Get a Model! Model Hijacking Attack Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 13
- 2020Federated Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Trustworthy Distributed AI Systems: Robustness, Privacy, and Governancecited by 12
- 2024On the Efficiency of Privacy Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 3
- 2026Osmosis Distillation: Model Hijacking with the Fewest Samplescited by 1
- 2024Data Poisoning and Leakage Analysis in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Osmosis Distillation: Model Hijacking with the Fewest Samples5 Mar 2026
- 2024Data Poisoning and Leakage Analysis in Federated Learning19 Sep 2024
- 2024On the Efficiency of Privacy Attacks in Federated Learning15 Apr 2024
- 2024Trustworthy Distributed AI Systems: Robustness, Privacy, and Governance2 Feb 2024