mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multidimensional Uncertainty-Aware Evidential Neural Networks

arXiv 2012.13676 ↗First posted 26 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional deep neural networks (NNs) have significantly contributed to the state-of-the-art performance in the task of classification under various application domains. However, NNs have not considered inherent uncertainty in data associated with the class probabilities where misclassification under uncertainty may easily introduce high risk in decision making in real-world contexts (e.g., misclassification of objects in roads leads to serious accidents). Unlike Bayesian NN that indirectly infer uncertainty through weight uncertainties, evidential NNs (ENNs) have been recently proposed to explicitly model the uncertainty of class probabilities and use them for classification tasks. An ENN offers the formulation of the predictions of NNs as subjective opinions and learns the function by collecting an amount of evidence that can form the subjective opinions by a deterministic NN from data. However, the ENN is trained as a black box without explicitly considering inherent uncertainty in data with their different root causes, such as vacuity (i.e., uncertainty due to a lack of evidence) or dissonance (i.e., uncertainty due to conflicting evidence). By considering the multidimensional uncertainty, we proposed a novel uncertainty-aware evidential NN called WGAN-ENN (WENN) for solving an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection problem. We took a hybrid approach that combines Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (WGAN) with ENNs to jointly train a model with prior knowledge of a certain class, which has high vacuity for OOD samples. Via extensive empirical experiments based on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrated that the estimation of uncertainty by WENN can significantly help distinguish OOD samples from boundary samples. WENN outperformed in OOD detection when compared with other competitive counterparts.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

16 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Prior and Posterior Networks: A Survey on Evidential Deep Learning Methods For Uncertainty Estimationcited by 71
  2. 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Evidential Deep Learning and Its Applicationscited by 25
  3. 2021Uncertainty-Aware Reliable Text Classificationcited by 23
  4. 2024Uncertainty Estimation by Density Aware Evidential Deep Learningcited by 22
  5. 2024Revisiting Essential and Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep Learningcited by 15
  6. 2023Continual Evidential Deep Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 11
  7. 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 11
  8. 2022A Survey on Uncertainty Reasoning and Quantification for Decision Making: Belief Theory Meets Deep Learningcited by 6
  9. 2022SEED: Sound Event Early Detection via Evidential Uncertaintycited by 4
  10. 2025Efficient dataset construction using active learning and uncertainty-aware neural networks for plasma turbulent transport surrogate modelscited by 2
  11. 2025Bi-level Meta-Policy Control for Dynamic Uncertainty Calibration in Evidential Deep Learningcited by 1
  12. 2026Similarity-as-Evidence: Calibrating Overconfident VLMs for Interpretable and Label-Efficient Medical Active Learningcited by 1
4 more
  1. 2021Scene Uncertainty and the Wellington Posterior of Deterministic Image Classifierscited by 0
  2. 2026When Surface Form Changes Moderation Decisions: A Paired Study of Code-Mixed Workflow Instabilitycited by 0
  3. 2026Visualizing Uncertainty: Spatial Maps of Missing and Conflicting Evidence in Deep Learningcited by 0
  4. 2026Subtype Robustness Is Not Just Accuracy: Calibration Under Unseen Subtype Shiftcited by 0