mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Efficient dataset construction using active learning and uncertainty-aware neural networks for plasma turbulent transport surrogate models

arXiv 2507.15976 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2025physics.plasm-ph cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work demonstrates a proof-of-principle for using uncertainty-aware architectures, in combination with active learning techniques and an in-the-loop physics simulation code as a data labeller, to construct efficient datasets for data-driven surrogate model generation. Building off of a previous proof-of-principle successfully demonstrating training set reduction on static pre-labelled datasets, using the ADEPT framework, this strategy was applied again to the plasma turbulent transport problem within tokamak fusion plasmas, specifically the QuaLiKiz quasilinear electrostatic gyrokinetic turbulent transport code. While QuaLiKiz provides relatively fast evaluations, this study specifically targeted small datasets to serve as a proxy for more expensive codes, such as CGYRO or GENE. The newly implemented algorithm uses the SNGP architecture for the classification component of the problem and the BNN-NCP architecture for the regression component, training models for all turbulent modes (ITG, TEM, ETG) and all transport fluxes (Qe, Qi, Gammae, Gammai, and Pii) described by the general QuaLiKiz output. With 45 active learning iterations, moving from a small initial training set of 102 to a final set of 104, the resulting models reached a F1 classification performance of ~0.8 and a R2 regression performance of ~0.75 on an independent test set across all outputs. This extrapolates to reaching the same performance and efficiency as the previous ADEPT pipeline, although on a problem with 1 extra input dimension. While the improvement rate achieved in this implementation diminishes faster than expected, the overall technique is formulated with components that can be upgraded and generalized to many surrogate modeling applications beyond plasma turbulent transport predictions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2025.

Builds on

18 of 78 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  3. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 767
  4. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 729
  5. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 606
  6. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 550
  7. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 430
  8. 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
  9. 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 361
  10. 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 337
  11. 2018Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimizationcited by 113
  12. 2023A Review of Uncertainty Estimation and its Application in Medical Imagingcited by 59
6 more
  1. 2022A Simple Approach to Improve Single-Model Deep Uncertainty via Distance-Awarenesscited by 49
  2. 2023Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: a Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goalcited by 17
  3. 2020Multidimensional Uncertainty-Aware Evidential Neural Networkscited by 16
  4. 2023Addressing Deep Learning Model Calibration Using Evidential Neural Networks and Uncertainty-Aware Trainingcited by 5
  5. 2023Enhancing predictive capabilities in fusion burning plasmas through surrogate-based optimization in core transport solverscited by 4
  6. 2024EuroPED-NN: Uncertainty aware surrogate modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.