mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LQF: Linear Quadratic Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2012.11140 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classifiers that are linear in their parameters, and trained by optimizing a convex loss function, have predictable behavior with respect to changes in the training data, initial conditions, and optimization. Such desirable properties are absent in deep neural networks (DNNs), typically trained by non-linear fine-tuning of a pre-trained model. Previous attempts to linearize DNNs have led to interesting theoretical insights, but have not impacted the practice due to the substantial performance gap compared to standard non-linear optimization. We present the first method for linearizing a pre-trained model that achieves comparable performance to non-linear fine-tuning on most of real-world image classification tasks tested, thus enjoying the interpretability of linear models without incurring punishing losses in performance. LQF consists of simple modifications to the architecture, loss function and optimization typically used for classification: Leaky-ReLU instead of ReLU, mean squared loss instead of cross-entropy, and pre-conditioning using Kronecker factorization. None of these changes in isolation is sufficient to approach the performance of non-linear fine-tuning. When used in combination, they allow us to reach comparable performance, and even superior in the low-data regime, while enjoying the simplicity, robustness and interpretability of linear-quadratic optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 9; 2023: 9; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
  2. 2023Task Arithmetic in the Tangent Space: Improved Editing of Pre-Trained Modelscited by 218
  3. 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
  4. 2022Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer Visioncited by 53
  5. 2022ASIF: Coupled Data Turns Unimodal Models to Multimodal Without Trainingcited by 45
  6. 2023The Journey, Not the Destination: How Data Guides Diffusion Modelscited by 42
  7. 2023SAFE: Machine Unlearning With Shard Graphscited by 28
  8. 2022TCT: Convexifying Federated Learning using Bootstrapped Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 26
  9. 2023Tangent Model Composition for Ensembling and Continual Fine-tuningcited by 25
  10. 2024Diffusion Soup: Model Merging for Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 25
  11. 2023Taming AI Bots: Controllability of Neural States in Large Language Modelscited by 22
  12. 2022SphereFed: Hyperspherical Federated Learningcited by 19
13 more
  1. 2023Training Data Protection with Compositional Diffusion Modelscited by 16
  2. 2023Tangent Transformers for Composition, Privacy and Removalcited by 13
  3. 2022DLCFT: Deep Linear Continual Fine-Tuning for General Incremental Learningcited by 11
  4. 2022Scale-invariant Bayesian Neural Networks with Connectivity Tangent Kernelcited by 7
  5. 2023Train/Test-Time Adaptation with Retrievalcited by 7
  6. 2021DIVA: Dataset Derivative of a Learning Taskcited by 4
  7. 2022Integral Continual Learning Along the Tangent Vector Field of Taskscited by 3
  8. 2026Dataless Weight Disentanglement in Task Arithmetic via Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 3
  9. 2022Towards Differential Relational Privacy and its use in Question Answeringcited by 1
  10. 2025Thumb on the Scale: Optimal Loss Weighting in Last Layer Retrainingcited by 1
  11. 2021Scene Uncertainty and the Wellington Posterior of Deterministic Image Classifierscited by 0
  12. 2025Mathematics of Continual Learningcited by 0
  13. 2025Scalable Data Attribution via Forward-Only Test-Time Inferencecited by 0