Probing for Phonology in Self-Supervised Speech Representations: A Case Study on Accent Perception
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional models of accent perception underestimate the role of gradient variations in phonological features which listeners rely upon for their accent judgments. We investigate how pretrained representations from current self-supervised learning (SSL) models of speech encode phonological feature-level variations that influence the perception of segmental accent. We focus on three segments: the labiodental approximant, the rhotic tap, and the retroflex stop, which are uniformly produced in the English of native speakers of Hindi as well as other languages in the Indian sub-continent. We use the CSLU Foreign Accented English corpus (Lander, 2007) to extract, for these segments, phonological feature probabilities using Phonet (V'asquez-Correa et al., 2019) and pretrained representations from Wav2Vec2-BERT (Barrault et al., 2023) and WavLM (Chen et al., 2022) along with accent judgements by native speakers of American English. Probing analyses show that accent strength is best predicted by a subset of the segment's pretrained representation features, in which perceptually salient phonological features that contrast the expected American English and realized non-native English segments are given prominent weighting. A multinomial logistic regression of pretrained representation-based segment distances from American and Indian English baselines on accent ratings reveals strong associations between the odds of accent strength and distances from the baselines, in the expected directions. These results highlight the value of self-supervised speech representations for modeling accent perception using interpretable phonological features.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2025.
Builds on
20 of 82 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,342
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,218
- 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,863
- 2021WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processingcited by 1,657
- 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
- 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
- 2021W2v-BERT: Combining Contrastive Learning and Masked Language Modeling for Self-Supervised Speech Pre-Trainingcited by 347
- 2021Layer-wise Analysis of a Self-supervised Speech Representation Modelcited by 298
- 2022Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Reviewcited by 260
- 2023Seamless: Multilingual Expressive and Streaming Speech Translationcited by 192
8 more
- 2023ML-SUPERB: Multilingual Speech Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 71
- 2022Probing phoneme, language and speaker information in unsupervised speech representationscited by 33
- 2023CommonAccent: Exploring Large Acoustic Pretrained Models for Accent Classification Based on Common Voicecited by 20
- 2023What Can an Accent Identifier Learn? Probing Phonetic and Prosodic Information in a Wav2vec2-based Accent Identification Modelcited by 18
- 2020Neural Representations for Modeling Variation in Speechcited by 14
- 2021Improving Accent Identification and Accented Speech Recognition Under a Framework of Self-supervised Learningcited by 13
- 2024Explaining Deep Learning Embeddings for Speech Emotion Recognition by Predicting Interpretable Acoustic Featurescited by 2
- 2025Normalization through Fine-tuning: Understanding Wav2vec 2.0 Embeddings for Phonetic Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.