Explaining Conditions for Reinforcement Learning Behaviors from Real and Imagined Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The deployment of reinforcement learning (RL) in the real world comes with challenges in calibrating user trust and expectations. As a step toward developing RL systems that are able to communicate their competencies, we present a method of generating human-interpretable abstract behavior models that identify the experiential conditions leading to different task execution strategies and outcomes. Our approach consists of extracting experiential features from state representations, abstracting strategy descriptors from trajectories, and training an interpretable decision tree that identifies the conditions most predictive of different RL behaviors. We demonstrate our method on trajectory data generated from interactions with the environment and on imagined trajectory data that comes from a trained probabilistic world model in a model-based RL setting.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Explaining RL Decisions with Trajectories
- 2025Behaviour Discovery and Attribution for Explainable Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Towards Automated Semantic Interpretability in Reinforcement Learning via Vision-Language Models
- 2026What Do World Models Learn in RL? Probing Latent Representations in Learned Environment Simulators
- 2019Learning Human Objectives by Evaluating Hypothetical Behavior
- 2025Evaluating Interpretable Reinforcement Learning by Distilling Policies into Programs
- 2025Better Decisions through the Right Causal World Model
- 2023Explainable Reinforcement Learning via a Causal World Model