mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A new Gradient TD Algorithm with only One Step-size: Convergence Rate Analysis using L-λ Smoothness

arXiv 2307.15892 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient Temporal Difference (GTD) algorithms (Sutton et al., 2008, 2009) are the first O(d) (d is the number features) algorithms that have convergence guarantees for off-policy learning with linear function approximation. Liu et al. (2015) and Dalal et. al. (2018) proved the convergence rates of GTD, GTD2 and TDC are O(t-α/2) for some α ∈ (0,1). This bound is tight (Dalal et al., 2020), and slower than O(1/√t). GTD algorithms also have two step-size parameters, which are difficult to tune. In literature, there is a "single-time-scale" formulation of GTD. However, this formulation still has two step-size parameters. This paper presents a truly single-time-scale GTD algorithm for minimizing the Norm of Expected td Update (NEU) objective, and it has only one step-size parameter. We prove that the new algorithm, called Impression GTD, converges at least as fast as O(1/t). Furthermore, based on a generalization of the expected smoothness (Gower et al. 2019), called L-λ smoothness, we are able to prove that the new GTD converges even faster, in fact, with a linear rate. Our rate actually also improves Gower et al.'s result with a tighter bound under a weaker assumption. Besides Impression GTD, we also prove the rates of three other GTD algorithms, one by Yao and Liu (2008), another called A-transpose-TD (Sutton et al., 2008), and a counterpart of A-transpose-TD. The convergence rates of all the four GTD algorithms are proved in a single generic GTD framework to which L-λ smoothness applies. Empirical results on Random walks, Boyan chain, and Baird counterexample show that Impression GTD converges much faster than existing GTD algorithms for both on-policy and off-policy learning problems, with well-performing step-sizes in a big range.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2023.

Builds on

40 of 101 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  2. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  3. 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
  4. 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
  5. 2019Towards Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning with Marginalized Importance Samplingcited by 118
  6. 2015An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 103
  7. 2020GradientDICE: Rethinking Generalized Offline Estimation of Stationary Valuescited by 70
  8. 2017Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Policy Evaluationcited by 56
  9. 2018A Single Time-Scale Stochastic Approximation Method for Nested Stochastic Optimizationcited by 53
  10. 2017Consistent On-Line Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 51
  11. 2019Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning by Bootstrapping the Covariate Shiftcited by 47
  12. 2019A Finite-Time Analysis of Q-Learning with Neural Network Function Approximationcited by 47
28 more
  1. 2021Breaking the Deadly Triad with a Target Networkcited by 47
  2. 2016Accelerating Stochastic Composition Optimizationcited by 46
  3. 2021Universal Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 43
  4. 2019Finite-Time Performance Bounds and Adaptive Learning Rate Selection for Two Time-Scale Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  5. 2020Gradient Temporal-Difference Learning with Regularized Correctionscited by 38
  6. 2019A Kernel Loss for Solving the Bellman Equationcited by 37
  7. 2020Finite-Sample Analysis of Proximal Gradient TD Algorithmscited by 32
  8. 2019Two Time-scale Off-Policy TD Learning: Non-asymptotic Analysis over Markovian Samplescited by 31
  9. 2019A Tale of Two-Timescale Reinforcement Learning with the Tightest Finite-Time Boundcited by 31
  10. 2021Average-Reward Off-Policy Policy Evaluation with Function Approximationcited by 30
  11. 2015On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 21
  12. 2019Deep Residual Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  13. 2020Sample Complexity Bounds for Two Timescale Value-based Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 19
  14. 2019Finite-Time Analysis and Restarting Scheme for Linear Two-Time-Scale Stochastic Approximationcited by 18
  15. 2015Generalized Emphatic Temporal Difference Learning: Bias-Variance Analysiscited by 17
  16. 2014The Sample Complexity of Learning Linear Predictors with the Squared Losscited by 16
  17. 2015Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 16
  18. 2016Investigating practical linear temporal difference learningcited by 13
  19. 2019Conditional Importance Sampling for Off-Policy Learningcited by 12
  20. 2017On Convergence of some Gradient-based Temporal-Differences Algorithms for Off-Policy Learningcited by 11
  21. 2016Accelerated Gradient Temporal Difference Learningcited by 10
  22. 2020Regularized Off-Policy TD-Learningcited by 10
  23. 2017A First Empirical Study of Emphatic Temporal Difference Learningcited by 6
  24. 2019Convergence Rates of Subgradient Methods for Quasi-convex Optimization Problemscited by 6
  25. 2020Variance-Reduced Off-Policy Memory-Efficient Policy Searchcited by 6
  26. 2019SVRG for Policy Evaluation with Fewer Gradient Evaluationscited by 5
  27. 2023Toward Efficient Gradient-Based Value Estimationcited by 4
  28. 2021An Empirical Comparison of Off-policy Prediction Learning Algorithms in the Four Rooms Environmentcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.