Optimal Approximation -- Smoothness Tradeoffs for Soft-Max Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A soft-max function has two main efficiency measures: (1) approximation - which corresponds to how well it approximates the maximum function, (2) smoothness - which shows how sensitive it is to changes of its input. Our goal is to identify the optimal approximation-smoothness tradeoffs for different measures of approximation and smoothness. This leads to novel soft-max functions, each of which is optimal for a different application. The most commonly used soft-max function, called exponential mechanism, has optimal tradeoff between approximation measured in terms of expected additive approximation and smoothness measured with respect to R'enyi Divergence. We introduce a soft-max function, called "piecewise linear soft-max", with optimal tradeoff between approximation, measured in terms of worst-case additive approximation and smoothness, measured with respect to ℓq-norm. The worst-case approximation guarantee of the piecewise linear mechanism enforces sparsity in the output of our soft-max function, a property that is known to be important in Machine Learning applications [Martins et al. '16, Laha et al. '18] and is not satisfied by the exponential mechanism. Moreover, the ℓq-smoothness is suitable for applications in Mechanism Design and Game Theory where the piecewise linear mechanism outperforms the exponential mechanism. Finally, we investigate another soft-max function, called power mechanism, with optimal tradeoff between expected textitmultiplicative approximation and smoothness with respect to the R'enyi Divergence, which provides improved theoretical and practical results in differentially private submodular optimization.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
10 papers.
- 2022Instance-Dependent Near-Optimal Policy Identification in Linear MDPs via Online Experiment Designcited by 33
- 2022Provably Efficient Model-Free Constrained RL with Linear Function Approximationcited by 29
- 2023Long-Term Fairness with Unknown Dynamicscited by 25
- 2023Replicability in Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2022Breaking Correlation Shift via Conditional Invariant Regularizercited by 7
- 2024A Statistical Framework for Data-dependent Retrieval-Augmented Modelscited by 2
- 2025Convergence of Policy Mirror Descent Beyond Compatible Function Approximationcited by 2
- 2022Provably Efficient Model-free RL in Leader-Follower MDP with Linear Function Approximationcited by 1
- 2025Scalable Min-Max Optimization via Primal-Dual Exact Pareto Optimizationcited by 0
- 2025An Elementary Proof of the Near Optimality of LogSumExp Smoothingcited by 0
- 2025An Elementary Proof of the Near Optimality of LogSumExp Smoothing11 Dec 2025
- 2025Scalable Min-Max Optimization via Primal-Dual Exact Pareto Optimization16 Mar 2025
- 2025Convergence of Policy Mirror Descent Beyond Compatible Function Approximation16 Feb 2025
- 2024A Statistical Framework for Data-dependent Retrieval-Augmented Models27 Aug 2024
- 2023Replicability in Reinforcement Learning31 May 2023
- 2023Long-Term Fairness with Unknown Dynamics19 Apr 2023
- 2022Provably Efficient Model-free RL in Leader-Follower MDP with Linear Function Approximation28 Nov 2022
- 2022Breaking Correlation Shift via Conditional Invariant Regularizer14 Jul 2022
- 2022Instance-Dependent Near-Optimal Policy Identification in Linear MDPs via Online Experiment Design6 Jul 2022
- 2022Provably Efficient Model-Free Constrained RL with Linear Function Approximation23 Jun 2022