mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minor changes make a difference: a case study on the consistency of UD-based dependency parsers

arXiv 2111.15413 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2021cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many downstream applications are using dependency trees, and are thus relying on dependency parsers producing correct, or at least consistent, output. However, dependency parsers are trained using machine learning, and are therefore susceptible to unwanted inconsistencies due to biases in the training data. This paper explores the effects of such biases in four languages - English, Swedish, Russian, and Ukrainian - though an experiment where we study the effect of replacing numerals in sentences. We show that such seemingly insignificant changes in the input can cause large differences in the output, and suggest that data augmentation can remedy the problems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.

Builds on

5 of 12 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  2. 2019All Roads Lead to UD: Converting Stanford and Penn Parses to English Universal Dependencies with Multilayer Annotationscited by 9
  3. 2020Automatic Extraction of Rules Governing Morphological Agreementcited by 9
  4. 2021Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Textscited by 8
  5. 2021Quinductor: a multilingual data-driven method for generating reading-comprehension questions using Universal Dependenciescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.