Uncertainty Estimation and Sample Selection for Crowd Counting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a method for image-based crowd counting, one that can predict a crowd density map together with the uncertainty values pertaining to the predicted density map. To obtain prediction uncertainty, we model the crowd density values using Gaussian distributions and develop a convolutional neural network architecture to predict these distributions. A key advantage of our method over existing crowd counting methods is its ability to quantify the uncertainty of its predictions. We illustrate the benefits of knowing the prediction uncertainty by developing a method to reduce the human annotation effort needed to adapt counting networks to a new domain. We present sample selection strategies which make use of the density and uncertainty of predictions from the networks trained on one domain to select the informative images from a target domain of interest to acquire human annotation. We show that our sample selection strategy drastically reduces the amount of labeled data from the target domain needed to adapt a counting network trained on a source domain to the target domain. Empirically, the networks trained on UCF-QNRF dataset can be adapted to surpass the performance of the previous state-of-the-art results on NWPU dataset and Shanghaitech dataset using only 17% of the labeled training samples from the target domain.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021Learning To Count Everythingcited by 149
- 2022Few-shot Object Counting and Detectioncited by 55
- 2021Spatial Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Crowd Countingcited by 38
- 2022Exemplar Free Class Agnostic Countingcited by 32
- 2025The challenge of uncertainty quantification of large language models in medicinecited by 14
- 2023Interactive Class-Agnostic Object Countingcited by 8
- 2023Cross-head Supervision for Crowd Counting with Noisy Annotationscited by 7
- 2025Can Current AI Models Count What We Mean, Not What They See? A Benchmark and Systematic Evaluationcited by 7
- 2023Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting with Contextual Modeling: Facilitating Holistic Understanding of Crowd Scenescited by 6
- 2021Fine-grained Domain Adaptive Crowd Counting via Point-derived Segmentationcited by 4
- 2021Reducing Spatial Labeling Redundancy for Semi-supervised Crowd Countingcited by 0
- 2025Can Current AI Models Count What We Mean, Not What They See? A Benchmark and Systematic Evaluation17 Sep 2025
- 2025The challenge of uncertainty quantification of large language models in medicine7 Apr 2025
- 2023Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting with Contextual Modeling: Facilitating Holistic Understanding of Crowd Scenes16 Oct 2023
- 2023Interactive Class-Agnostic Object Counting11 Sep 2023
- 2023Cross-head Supervision for Crowd Counting with Noisy Annotations16 Mar 2023
- 2022Few-shot Object Counting and Detection22 Jul 2022
- 2022Exemplar Free Class Agnostic Counting27 May 2022
- 2021Fine-grained Domain Adaptive Crowd Counting via Point-derived Segmentation6 Aug 2021
- 2021Reducing Spatial Labeling Redundancy for Semi-supervised Crowd Counting6 Aug 2021
- 2021Spatial Uncertainty-Aware Semi-Supervised Crowd Counting28 Jul 2021
- 2021Learning To Count Everything16 Apr 2021