Perceptual Video Quality Prediction Emphasizing Chroma Distortions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Measuring the quality of digital videos viewed by human observers has become a common practice in numerous multimedia applications, such as adaptive video streaming, quality monitoring, and other digital TV applications. Here we explore a significant, yet relatively unexplored problem: measuring perceptual quality on videos arising from both luma and chroma distortions from compression. Toward investigating this problem, it is important to understand the kinds of chroma distortions that arise, how they relate to luma compression distortions, and how they can affect perceived quality. We designed and carried out a subjective experiment to measure subjective video quality on both luma and chroma distortions, introduced both in isolation as well as together. Specifically, the new subjective dataset comprises a total of 210 videos afflicted by distortions caused by varying levels of luma quantization commingled with different amounts of chroma quantization. The subjective scores were evaluated by 34 subjects in a controlled environmental setting. Using the newly collected subjective data, we were able to demonstrate important shortcomings of existing video quality models, especially in regards to chroma distortions. Further, we designed an objective video quality model which builds on existing video quality algorithms, by considering the fidelity of chroma channels in a principled way. We also found that this quality analysis implies that there is room for reducing bitrate consumption in modern video codecs by creatively increasing the compression factor on chroma channels. We believe that this work will both encourage further research in this direction, as well as advance progress on the ultimate goal of jointly optimizing luma and chroma compression in modern video encoders.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
- 2021Blindly Assess Quality of In-the-Wild Videos via Quality-aware Pre-training and Motion Perceptioncited by 97
- 2022Subjective Assessment of High Dynamic Range Videos Under Different Ambient Conditionscited by 12
- 2024CLIPVQA:Video Quality Assessment via CLIPcited by 11
- 2022FUNQUE: Fusion of Unified Quality Evaluatorscited by 8
- 2021Regression or Classification? New Methods to Evaluate No-Reference Picture and Video Quality Modelscited by 4
- 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment of UGC Gaming Videoscited by 3
- 2021Deep Image Debandingcited by 2
- 2026FDIM: A Feature-distance-based Generic Video Quality Metric for Versatile Codecscited by 0
- 2026GS-NFS: Bandwidth-adaptive Streaming of Dynamic Gaussian Splats and Point Cloudscited by 0
- 2026GS-NFS: Bandwidth-adaptive Streaming of Dynamic Gaussian Splats and Point Clouds4 Jun 2026
- 2026FDIM: A Feature-distance-based Generic Video Quality Metric for Versatile Codecs27 Apr 2026
- 2024CLIPVQA:Video Quality Assessment via CLIP6 Jul 2024
- 2022Subjective Assessment of High Dynamic Range Videos Under Different Ambient Conditions20 Sep 2022
- 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment of UGC Gaming Videos31 Mar 2022
- 2022FUNQUE: Fusion of Unified Quality Evaluators23 Feb 2022
- 2021Deep Image Debanding16 Oct 2021
- 2021Blindly Assess Quality of In-the-Wild Videos via Quality-aware Pre-training and Motion Perception19 Aug 2021
- 2021Regression or Classification? New Methods to Evaluate No-Reference Picture and Video Quality Models30 Jan 2021
- 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Content26 Jan 2021