mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Qualitative Study of the Dynamic Behavior for Adaptive Gradient Algorithms

arXiv 2009.06125 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 31

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The dynamic behavior of RMSprop and Adam algorithms is studied through a combination of careful numerical experiments and theoretical explanations. Three types of qualitative features are observed in the training loss curve: fast initial convergence, oscillations, and large spikes in the late phase. The sign gradient descent (signGD) flow, which is the limit of Adam when taking the learning rate to 0 while keeping the momentum parameters fixed, is used to explain the fast initial convergence. For the late phase of Adam, three different types of qualitative patterns are observed depending on the choice of the hyper-parameters: oscillations, spikes, and divergence. In particular, Adam converges much smoother and even faster when the values of the two momentum factors are close to each other. This observation is particularly important for scientific computing tasks, for which the training process usually proceeds into the high precision regime.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 8; 2026: 14.

31 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
  2. 2022On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient Algorithmscited by 100
  3. 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 88
  4. 2024Unintentional Unalignment: Likelihood Displacement in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 66
  5. 2023On the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 25
  6. 2025A Multi-Power Law for Loss Curve Prediction Across Learning Rate Schedulescited by 22
  7. 2025Scaling Laws for Gradient Descent and Sign Descent for Linear Bigram Models under Zipf's Lawcited by 19
  8. 2023Loss Spike in Training Neural Networkscited by 15
  9. 2025Adaptive Preconditioners Trigger Loss Spikes in Adamcited by 10
  10. 2023Understanding the robustness difference between stochastic gradient descent and adaptive gradient methodscited by 8
  11. 2025ODE approximation for the Adam algorithm: General and overparametrized settingcited by 8
  12. 2025How Memory in Optimization Algorithms Implicitly Modifies the Losscited by 6
19 more
  1. 2026Forgetting in Language Models: Capacity, Optimization, and Self-Generated Replaycited by 5
  2. 2026The Effect of Mini-Batch Noise on the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 4
  3. 2026Grokking or Glitching? How Low-Precision Drives Slingshot Loss Spikescited by 4
  4. 2025AdaGC: Enhancing LLM Pretraining Stability via Adaptive Gradient Clippingcited by 3
  5. 2026Towards Understanding Adam Convergence on Highly Degenerate Polynomialscited by 3
  6. 2024A Mirror Descent Perspective of Smoothed Sign Descentcited by 2
  7. 2025Effective continuous equations for adaptive SGD: a stochastic analysis viewcited by 1
  8. 2026Why β1 = β2 Is Dynamically Special in Adamcited by 1
  9. 2026Adam-SHANG: A Convergent Adam-Type Method for Stochastic Smooth Convex Optimizationcited by 1
  10. 2026Weight-norm Criticality: A Mechanism for Loss Spikes Induced by the Normalization and Weight Decaycited by 1
  11. 2026Finite-Horizon Input-Output Dynamics of Minibatch Perturbations in AdamWcited by 1
  12. 2024Beyond adaptive gradient: Fast-Controlled Minibatch Algorithm for large-scale optimizationcited by 0
  13. 2025Some Optimizers are More Equal: Understanding the Role of Optimizers in Group Fairnesscited by 0
  14. 2026Same Error, Different Function: The Optimizer as an Implicit Prior in Financial Time Seriescited by 0
  15. 2026Refresh-Scaling the Memory of Balanced Adamcited by 0
  16. 2026Understanding Dynamics of Adam in Zero-Sum Games: An ODE Approachcited by 0
  17. 2026Convergence rates for the RMSprop optimizer with full control of the hyperparameterscited by 0
  18. 2026An Exploratory Study of Frequency-Aware Task Weighting for YOLOv8-Based Unified Driving Perceptioncited by 0
  19. 2026Beyond Quadratic Loss: The Stability Phase Diagram of Adamcited by 0