mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

WAFFLE: Watermarking in Federated Learning

arXiv 2008.07298 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2020cs.CR cs.DC cs.LGcited by 34

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning is a distributed learning technique where machine learning models are trained on client devices in which the local training data resides. The training is coordinated via a central server which is, typically, controlled by the intended owner of the resulting model. By avoiding the need to transport the training data to the central server, federated learning improves privacy and efficiency. But it raises the risk of model theft by clients because the resulting model is available on every client device. Even if the application software used for local training may attempt to prevent direct access to the model, a malicious client may bypass any such restrictions by reverse engineering the application software. Watermarking is a well-known deterrence method against model theft by providing the means for model owners to demonstrate ownership of their models. Several recent deep neural network (DNN) watermarking techniques use backdooring: training the models with additional mislabeled data. Backdooring requires full access to the training data and control of the training process. This is feasible when a single party trains the model in a centralized manner, but not in a federated learning setting where the training process and training data are distributed among several client devices. In this paper, we present WAFFLE, the first approach to watermark DNN models trained using federated learning. It introduces a retraining step at the server after each aggregation of local models into the global model. We show that WAFFLE efficiently embeds a resilient watermark into models incurring only negligible degradation in test accuracy (-0.17%), and does not require access to training data. We also introduce a novel technique to generate the backdoor used as a watermark. It outperforms prior techniques, imposing no communication, and low computational (+3.2%) overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 34 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 11; 2024: 8; 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

34 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023A Recipe for Watermarking Diffusion Modelscited by 136
  2. 2024Explanation as a Watermark: Towards Harmless and Multi-bit Model Ownership Verification via Watermarking Feature Attributioncited by 35
  3. 2023A Survey on ChatGPT: AI-Generated Contents, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 34
  4. 2021FedIPR: Ownership Verification for Federated Deep Neural Network Modelscited by 33
  5. 2024Advances and Open Challenges in Federated Foundation Modelscited by 33
  6. 2023Integration of Large Language Models and Federated Learningcited by 28
  7. 2022FedTracker: Furnishing Ownership Verification and Traceability for Federated Learning Modelcited by 25
  8. 2023Federated Learning for Computer Visioncited by 22
  9. 2025Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Modelscited by 20
  10. 2022Watermarking in Secure Federated Learning: A Verification Framework Based on Client-Side Backdooringcited by 14
  11. 2024Synergizing Foundation Models and Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 14
  12. 2024Advances in Robust Federated Learning: A Survey with Heterogeneity Considerationscited by 12
22 more
  1. 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attackscited by 11
  2. 2023FedZKP: Federated Model Ownership Verification with Zero-knowledge Proofcited by 9
  3. 2023A Survey on Vulnerability of Federated Learning: A Learning Algorithm Perspectivecited by 9
  4. 2023FedRight: An Effective Model Copyright Protection for Federated Learningcited by 8
  5. 2023When Federated Learning meets Watermarking: A Comprehensive Overview of Techniques for Intellectual Property Protectioncited by 6
  6. 2024DeepEclipse: How to Break White-Box DNN-Watermarking Schemescited by 4
  7. 2024Graph Neural Backdoor: Fundamentals, Methodologies, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 4
  8. 2023FedSOV: Federated Model Secure Ownership Verification with Unforgeable Signaturecited by 3
  9. 2023Towards Open Federated Learning Platforms: Survey and Vision from Technical and Legal Perspectivescited by 3
  10. 2024RobWE: Robust Watermark Embedding for Personalized Federated Learning Model Ownership Protectioncited by 3
  11. 2025Watermarking Graph Neural Networks via Explanations for Ownership Protectioncited by 3
  12. 2025Technical and Legal Aspects of Federated Learning in Bioinformatics: Applications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 2
  13. 2022Knowledge-Free Black-Box Watermark and Ownership Proof for Image Classification Neural Networkscited by 1
  14. 2025FedPoP: Federated Learning Meets Proof of Participationcited by 1
  15. 2024Watermarking Recommender Systemscited by 0
  16. 2025Traceable Black-box Watermarks for Federated Learningcited by 0
  17. 2025FLClear: Visually Verifiable Multi-Client Watermarking for Federated Learningcited by 0
  18. 2025Robust Client-Server Watermarking for Split Federated Learningcited by 0
  19. 2025Server-Enforced Watermarking in U-Shaped Split Federated Learningcited by 0
  20. 2026Repurposing Backdoors for Good: Ephemeral Intrinsic Proofs for Verifiable Aggregation in Cross-silo Federated Learningcited by 0
  21. 2026FedOT: Ownership Verification and Leakage Tracing via Watermarks for Federated LDMscited by 0
  22. 2026ZK-Trace: Certified Collusion Tracing with Zero-Knowledge Credentials for Federated GNSS Interference Monitoringcited by 0