Server-Enforced Watermarking in U-Shaped Split Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
U-shaped split federated learning (U-SFL) enables resource-constrained Internet of Things devices to collaboratively train models with an edge server while retaining raw data and labels locally. We consider model-service deployments in which a provider supplies proprietary models whose client-side segments reside on participating devices, creating risks of unauthorized copying and redistribution. Protecting these segments is challenging because the server cannot directly access client data, labels, or model parameters, and potentially malicious clients may refuse to perform watermark embedding. To address this challenge, we propose Sigil, a server-enforced watermarking framework for U-SFL. Sigil defines a secret watermark constraint in the server-visible activation space and embeds the watermark into client-side models by injecting a watermark gradient into the gradients returned during training. This mechanism requires neither access to clients' raw data and labels nor client-side watermarking operations. To limit interference with the main task and reduce detectability by gradient anomaly detectors, Sigil adaptively clips the watermark gradient relative to the main-task gradient. Experiments on two datasets and four model architectures demonstrate high watermark detection rates with limited impact on task accuracy, robustness against the evaluated removal attacks, and stealthiness against the evaluated gradient anomaly detector.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2025.
Builds on
23 of 41 references.
References · 23
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Split learning for health: Distributed deep learning without sharing raw patient datacited by 391
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
- 2020SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learningcited by 308
- 2018Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agentscited by 277
- 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 144
- 2020Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split Learningcited by 104
- 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 67
- 2024AdaptSFL: Adaptive Split Federated Learning in Resource-constrained Edge Networkscited by 64
- 2024Explanation as a Watermark: Towards Harmless and Multi-bit Model Ownership Verification via Watermarking Feature Attributioncited by 35
- 2020WAFFLE: Watermarking in Federated Learningcited by 34
- 2021FedIPR: Ownership Verification for Federated Deep Neural Network Modelscited by 33
11 more
- 2022FedTracker: Furnishing Ownership Verification and Traceability for Federated Learning Modelcited by 25
- 2021SplitGuard: Detecting and Mitigating Training-Hijacking Attacks in Split Learningcited by 20
- 2023Rethinking White-Box Watermarks on Deep Learning Models under Neural Structural Obfuscationcited by 20
- 2024MEA-Defender: A Robust Watermark against Model Extraction Attackcited by 16
- 2022Feature Space Hijacking Attacks against Differentially Private Split Learningcited by 14
- 2022Watermarking in Secure Federated Learning: A Verification Framework Based on Client-Side Backdooringcited by 14
- 2023Secure Split Learning against Property Inference, Data Reconstruction, and Feature Space Hijacking Attackscited by 8
- 2023On Feasibility of Server-side Backdoor Attacks on Split Learningcited by 6
- 2024COMSPLIT: A Communication-Aware Split Learning Design for Heterogeneous IoT Platformscited by 5
- 2023SplitOut: Out-of-the-Box Training-Hijacking Detection in Split Learning via Outlier Detectioncited by 4
- 2023RemovalNet: DNN Fingerprint Removal Attackscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.