Self-Expressing Autoencoders for Unsupervised Spoken Term Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unsupervised spoken term discovery consists of two tasks: finding the acoustic segment boundaries and labeling acoustically similar segments with the same labels. We perform segmentation based on the assumption that the frame feature vectors are more similar within a segment than across the segments. Therefore, for strong segmentation performance, it is crucial that the features represent the phonetic properties of a frame more than other factors of variability. We achieve this via a self-expressing autoencoder framework. It consists of a single encoder and two decoders with shared weights. The encoder projects the input features into a latent representation. One of the decoders tries to reconstruct the input from these latent representations and the other from the self-expressed version of them. We use the obtained features to segment and cluster the speech data. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method in the Zero Resource 2020 challenge unit discovery task. The proposed system consistently outperforms the baseline, demonstrating the usefulness of the method in learning representations.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Word Discovery in Visually Grounded, Self-Supervised Speech Modelscited by 37
- 2022Self-supervised language learning from raw audio: Lessons from the Zero Resource Speech Challengecited by 34
- 2022Word Segmentation on Discovered Phone Units with Dynamic Programming and Self-Supervised Scoringcited by 24
- 2022DP-Parse: Finding Word Boundaries from Raw Speech with an Instance Lexiconcited by 12
- 2023Syllable Discovery and Cross-Lingual Generalization in a Visually Grounded, Self-Supervised Speech Modelcited by 11
- 2022Speech Sequence Embeddings using Nearest Neighbors Contrastive Learningcited by 7
- 2021Global Rhythm Style Transfer Without Text Transcriptionscited by 6
- 2025Should Top-Down Clustering Affect Boundaries in Unsupervised Word Discovery?cited by 4
- 2025Unsupervised lexicon learning from speech is limited by representations rather than clusteringcited by 4
- 2024Revisiting speech segmentation and lexicon learning with better featurescited by 3
- 2026Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discoverycited by 1
- 2026Recovering the Zipfian Distribution in Unsupervised Term Discoverycited by 0
- 2026Recovering the Zipfian Distribution in Unsupervised Term Discovery9 Jun 2026
- 2026Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discovery4 Jun 2026
- 2025Unsupervised lexicon learning from speech is limited by representations rather than clustering10 Oct 2025
- 2025Should Top-Down Clustering Affect Boundaries in Unsupervised Word Discovery?25 Jul 2025
- 2024Revisiting speech segmentation and lexicon learning with better features31 Jan 2024
- 2023Syllable Discovery and Cross-Lingual Generalization in a Visually Grounded, Self-Supervised Speech Model19 May 2023
- 2022Self-supervised language learning from raw audio: Lessons from the Zero Resource Speech Challenge27 Oct 2022
- 2022DP-Parse: Finding Word Boundaries from Raw Speech with an Instance Lexicon22 Jun 2022
- 2022Speech Sequence Embeddings using Nearest Neighbors Contrastive Learning11 Apr 2022
- 2022Word Discovery in Visually Grounded, Self-Supervised Speech Models28 Mar 2022
- 2022Word Segmentation on Discovered Phone Units with Dynamic Programming and Self-Supervised Scoring24 Feb 2022
- 2021Global Rhythm Style Transfer Without Text Transcriptions16 Jun 2021