mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning Datasets

arXiv 2007.07399 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2020cs.CYcited by 43

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In response to algorithmic unfairness embedded in sociotechnical systems, significant attention has been focused on the contents of machine learning datasets which have revealed biases towards white, cisgender, male, and Western data subjects. In contrast, comparatively less attention has been paid to the histories, values, and norms embedded in such datasets. In this work, we outline a research program - a genealogy of machine learning data - for investigating how and why these datasets have been created, what and whose values influence the choices of data to collect, the contextual and contingent conditions of their creation. We describe the ways in which benchmark datasets in machine learning operate as infrastructure and pose four research questions for these datasets. This interrogation forces us to "bring the people back in" by aiding us in understanding the labor embedded in dataset construction, and thereby presenting new avenues of contestation for other researchers encountering the data.

Key facts. Cited by 43 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 13; 2023: 7; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

43 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  2. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
  3. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  4. 2021The Benchmark Lotterycited by 133
  5. 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
  6. 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
  7. 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
  8. 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
  9. 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
  10. 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
  11. 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 57
  12. 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
31 more
  1. 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
  2. 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Datacited by 31
  3. 2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim Itcited by 26
  4. 2022Bugs in the Data: How ImageNet Misrepresents Biodiversitycited by 24
  5. 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 23
  6. 2021Ethics Sheet for Automatic Emotion Recognition and Sentiment Analysiscited by 22
  7. 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
  8. 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AIcited by 16
  9. 2022A survey on GANs for computer vision: Recent research, analysis and taxonomycited by 15
  10. 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
  11. 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?cited by 11
  12. 2022Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethicscited by 11
  13. 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasetscited by 11
  14. 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labscited by 11
  15. 2022Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorizationcited by 10
  16. 2022Making Intelligence: Ethical Values in IQ and ML Benchmarkscited by 10
  17. 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarkingcited by 10
  18. 2021Model Selection's Disparate Impact in Real-World Deep Learning Applicationscited by 7
  19. 2022Language technology practitioners as language managers: arbitrating data bias and predictive bias in ASRcited by 7
  20. 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technologycited by 7
  21. 2024On the Workflows and Smells of Leaderboard Operations (LBOps): An Exploratory Study of Foundation Model Leaderboardscited by 6
  22. 2024Evaluating Model Performance Under Worst-case Subpopulationscited by 5
  23. 2024On the attribution of confidence to large language modelscited by 5
  24. 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"cited by 4
  25. 2023Uncovering Bias in Personal Informaticscited by 3
  26. 2022Improving Fairness in Large-Scale Object Recognition by CrowdSourced Demographic Informationcited by 2
  27. 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasetscited by 2
  28. 2021Exploring Data Pipelines through the Process Lens: a Reference Model forComputer Visioncited by 0
  29. 2023Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Resultscited by 0
  30. 2025"Just a strange pic": Evaluating 'safety' in GenAI Image safety annotation tasks from diverse annotators' perspectivescited by 0
  31. 2026From Perception to Action: Spatial AI Agents and World Modelscited by 0