Bringing the People Back In: Contesting Benchmark Machine Learning Datasets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In response to algorithmic unfairness embedded in sociotechnical systems, significant attention has been focused on the contents of machine learning datasets which have revealed biases towards white, cisgender, male, and Western data subjects. In contrast, comparatively less attention has been paid to the histories, values, and norms embedded in such datasets. In this work, we outline a research program - a genealogy of machine learning data - for investigating how and why these datasets have been created, what and whose values influence the choices of data to collect, the contextual and contingent conditions of their creation. We describe the ways in which benchmark datasets in machine learning operate as infrastructure and pose four research questions for these datasets. This interrogation forces us to "bring the people back in" by aiding us in understanding the labor embedded in dataset construction, and thereby presenting new avenues of contestation for other researchers encountering the data.
Key facts. Cited by 43 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 13; 2023: 7; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
43 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
- 2021The Benchmark Lotterycited by 133
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
- 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
- 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
- 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
- 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 57
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
31 more
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
- 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Datacited by 31
- 2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim Itcited by 26
- 2022Bugs in the Data: How ImageNet Misrepresents Biodiversitycited by 24
- 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 23
- 2021Ethics Sheet for Automatic Emotion Recognition and Sentiment Analysiscited by 22
- 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
- 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AIcited by 16
- 2022A survey on GANs for computer vision: Recent research, analysis and taxonomycited by 15
- 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systemscited by 12
- 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?cited by 11
- 2022Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethicscited by 11
- 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasetscited by 11
- 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labscited by 11
- 2022Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorizationcited by 10
- 2022Making Intelligence: Ethical Values in IQ and ML Benchmarkscited by 10
- 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarkingcited by 10
- 2021Model Selection's Disparate Impact in Real-World Deep Learning Applicationscited by 7
- 2022Language technology practitioners as language managers: arbitrating data bias and predictive bias in ASRcited by 7
- 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technologycited by 7
- 2024On the Workflows and Smells of Leaderboard Operations (LBOps): An Exploratory Study of Foundation Model Leaderboardscited by 6
- 2024Evaluating Model Performance Under Worst-case Subpopulationscited by 5
- 2024On the attribution of confidence to large language modelscited by 5
- 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"cited by 4
- 2023Uncovering Bias in Personal Informaticscited by 3
- 2022Improving Fairness in Large-Scale Object Recognition by CrowdSourced Demographic Informationcited by 2
- 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasetscited by 2
- 2021Exploring Data Pipelines through the Process Lens: a Reference Model forComputer Visioncited by 0
- 2023Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Resultscited by 0
- 2025"Just a strange pic": Evaluating 'safety' in GenAI Image safety annotation tasks from diverse annotators' perspectivescited by 0
- 2026From Perception to Action: Spatial AI Agents and World Modelscited by 0
- 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology31 Mar 2026
- 2026From Perception to Action: Spatial AI Agents and World Models2 Feb 2026
- 2025"Just a strange pic": Evaluating 'safety' in GenAI Image safety annotation tasks from diverse annotators' perspectives21 Jul 2025
- 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AI24 Mar 2025
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation10 Feb 2025
- 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"31 Oct 2024
- 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarking31 Oct 2024
- 2024On the attribution of confidence to large language models11 Jul 2024
- 2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim It11 Jul 2024
- 2024On the Workflows and Smells of Leaderboard Operations (LBOps): An Exploratory Study of Foundation Model Leaderboards4 Jul 2024
- 2024Evaluating Model Performance Under Worst-case Subpopulations1 Jul 2024
- 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasets10 Jun 2024
31 more
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation models29 May 2024
- 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipedia21 Feb 2024
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice2 Oct 2023
- 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmark31 Aug 2023
- 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labs16 Jun 2023
- 2023Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Results9 Jun 2023
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Report17 May 2023
- 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasets15 May 2023
- 2023Uncovering Bias in Personal Informatics27 Mar 2023
- 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Survey14 Oct 2022
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements28 Sep 2022
- 2022Making Intelligence: Ethical Values in IQ and ML Benchmarks1 Sep 2022
- 2022Bugs in the Data: How ImageNet Misrepresents Biodiversity24 Aug 2022
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development20 Jul 2022
- 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotation9 Jun 2022
- 2022Improving Fairness in Large-Scale Object Recognition by CrowdSourced Demographic Information2 Jun 2022
- 2022Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorization27 May 2022
- 2022Towards a multi-stakeholder value-based assessment framework for algorithmic systems9 May 2022
- 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches6 May 2022
- 2022Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics11 Apr 2022
- 2022A survey on GANs for computer vision: Recent research, analysis and taxonomy21 Mar 2022
- 2022Language technology practitioners as language managers: arbitrating data bias and predictive bias in ASR25 Feb 2022
- 2021Ethics Sheet for Automatic Emotion Recognition and Sentiment Analysis17 Sep 2021
- 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?16 Sep 2021
- 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Development9 Aug 2021
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Papers6 Aug 2021
- 2021The Benchmark Lottery14 Jul 2021
- 2021Exploring Data Pipelines through the Process Lens: a Reference Model forComputer Vision5 Jul 2021
- 2021Model Selection's Disparate Impact in Real-World Deep Learning Applications1 Apr 2021
- 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Data5 Mar 2021
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metrics2 Feb 2021
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
- 2023PaLM 2 Technical Report17 May 2023
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
- 2021The Benchmark Lotterycited by 133
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 89
- 2023The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practicecited by 86
- 2021Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Developmentcited by 85
- 2022Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Surveycited by 80
- 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
- 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluationcited by 57
- 2021Mitigating Dataset Harms Requires Stewardship: Lessons from 1000 Paperscited by 49
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation modelscited by 32
- 2021Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Datacited by 31
12 most cited of 40 All 40 (JSON)
- 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technology31 Mar 2026
- 2025"Just a strange pic": Evaluating 'safety' in GenAI Image safety annotation tasks from diverse annotators' perspectives21 Jul 2025
- 2025The Case for "Thick Evaluations" of Cultural Representation in AI24 Mar 2025
- 2025Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation10 Feb 2025
- 2024What Makes An Expert? Reviewing How ML Researchers Define "Expert"31 Oct 2024
- 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarking31 Oct 2024
- 2024On the attribution of confidence to large language models11 Jul 2024
- 2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim It11 Jul 2024
- 2024On the Workflows and Smells of Leaderboard Operations (LBOps): An Exploratory Study of Foundation Model Leaderboards4 Jul 2024
- 2024Evaluating Model Performance Under Worst-case Subpopulations1 Jul 2024
- 2024A Taxonomy of Challenges to Curating Fair Datasets10 Jun 2024
- 2024Participation in the age of foundation models29 May 2024
12 newest of 40 All 40 (JSON)