mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Overview of Gaussian process based multi-fidelity techniques with variable relationship between fidelities

arXiv 2006.16728 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The design process of complex systems such as new configurations of aircraft or launch vehicles is usually decomposed in different phases which are characterized for instance by the depth of the analyses in terms of number of design variables and fidelity of the physical models. At each phase, the designers have to compose with accurate but computationally intensive models as well as cheap but inaccurate models. Multi-fidelity modeling is a way to merge different fidelity models to provide engineers with accurate results with a limited computational cost. Within the context of multi-fidelity modeling, approaches relying on Gaussian Processes emerge as popular techniques to fuse information between the different fidelity models. The relationship between the fidelity models is a key aspect in multi-fidelity modeling. This paper provides an overview of Gaussian process-based multi-fidelity modeling techniques for variable relationship between the fidelity models (e.g., linearity, non-linearity, variable correlation). Each technique is described within a unified framework and the links between the different techniques are highlighted. All the approaches are numerically compared on a series of analytical test cases and four aerospace related engineering problems in order to assess their benefits and disadvantages with respect to the problem characteristics.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 8; 2025: 0; 2026: 5.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Recent Advances in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 74
  2. 2022Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Gaussian Process Regression is Ill-Posedcited by 16
  3. 2022Multi-fidelity Hierarchical Neural Processescited by 15
  4. 2024Multi-Fidelity Residual Neural Processes for Scalable Surrogate Modelingcited by 13
  5. 2023Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization: A Reviewcited by 12
  6. 2023Disentangled Multi-Fidelity Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 11
  7. 2023A Latent Variable Approach for Non-Hierarchical Multi-Fidelity Adaptive Samplingcited by 10
  8. 2021Federated Gaussian Process: Convergence, Automatic Personalization and Multi-fidelity Modelingcited by 8
  9. 2021Scalable Multi-Task Gaussian Processes with Neural Embedding of Coregionalizationcited by 5
  10. 2024Multi-Fidelity Methods for Optimization: A Surveycited by 5
  11. 2022Multi-fidelity Monte Carlo: a pseudo-marginal approachcited by 4
  12. 2024Multifidelity linear regression for scientific machine learning from scarce datacited by 3
12 more
  1. 2022Non-Myopic Multifidelity Bayesian Optimizationcited by 2
  2. 2024MFBind: a Multi-Fidelity Approach for Evaluating Drug Compounds in Practical Generative Modelingcited by 2
  3. 2024Uncertainty-aware multi-fidelity surrogate modeling with noisy datacited by 1
  4. 2024Combining additivity and active subspaces for high-dimensional Gaussian process modelingcited by 1
  5. 2024MF-LAL: Drug Compound Generation Using Multi-Fidelity Latent Space Active Learningcited by 1
  6. 2023Physics-informed reinforcement learning via probabilistic co-adjustment functionscited by 0
  7. 2024Gradient-enhanced deep Gaussian processes for multifidelity modellingcited by 0
  8. 2026MAST: A Multi-fidelity Augmented Surrogate model via Spatial Trust-weightingcited by 0
  9. 2026Optimization-Embedded Active Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Learning for Multi-Condition Airfoil Shape Optimizationcited by 0
  10. 2026Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Datacited by 0
  11. 2026Efficient Controller Learning from Human Preferences and Numerical Data Via Multi-Modal Surrogate Modelscited by 0
  12. 2026MF-SCBO : Multi-fidelity Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0