mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimization-Embedded Active Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Learning for Multi-Condition Airfoil Shape Optimization

arXiv 2603.17057 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026physics.flu-dyn cs.LG cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active multi-fidelity surrogate modeling is developed for multi-condition airfoil shape optimization to reduce high-fidelity CFD cost while retaining RANS-consistent aerodynamic metrics. The framework couples a low-fidelity-informed Gaussian process regression transfer model with uncertainty-triggered sampling and a synchronized elitism rule embedded in a hybrid genetic algorithm. Low-fidelity XFOIL evaluations provide inexpensive features, while sparse RANS simulations are adaptively allocated when predictive uncertainty exceeds a threshold; elite candidates are mandatorily validated at high fidelity, and the population is re-evaluated to prevent evolutionary selection based on outdated fitness values produced by earlier surrogate states. The method is demonstrated for a two-point problem at Re=6×106 with cruise at α=2^circ (maximize E=L/D) and take-off at α=10^circ (maximize CL) using a 12-parameter CST representation. Independent multi-fidelity surrogates per flight condition enable decoupled refinement. The optimized design improves cruise efficiency by 41.05% and take-off lift by 20.75% relative to the best first-generation individual. Over the full campaign, RANS evaluations were required for only 14.78% and 9.5% of the condition-specific candidate evaluations at cruise and take-off, respectively. These percentages quantify the reduction in high-fidelity usage relative to the fixed automated RANS workflow adopted as the high-fidelity reference in this study.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 66 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2020Multi-fidelity Bayesian Neural Networks: Algorithms and Applicationscited by 59
  3. 2022Multifidelity Deep Operator Networks For Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Problemscited by 58
  4. 2019Deep Gaussian Processes for Multi-fidelity Modelingcited by 50
  5. 2020Airfoil Design Parameterization and Optimization using B'ezier Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
  6. 2020Overview of Gaussian process based multi-fidelity techniques with variable relationship between fidelitiescited by 24
  7. 2023Deep neural operators can serve as accurate surrogates for shape optimization: A case study for airfoilscited by 19
  8. 2017Gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional problemscited by 15
  9. 2022Multi-fidelity reinforcement learning framework for shape optimizationcited by 9
  10. 2025Fast and robust parametric and functional learning with Hybrid Genetic Optimisation (HyGO)cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.