Combinatorial Pure Exploration of Dueling Bandit
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we study combinatorial pure exploration for dueling bandits (CPE-DB): we have multiple candidates for multiple positions as modeled by a bipartite graph, and in each round we sample a duel of two candidates on one position and observe who wins in the duel, with the goal of finding the best candidate-position matching with high probability after multiple rounds of samples. CPE-DB is an adaptation of the original combinatorial pure exploration for multi-armed bandit (CPE-MAB) problem to the dueling bandit setting. We consider both the Borda winner and the Condorcet winner cases. For Borda winner, we establish a reduction of the problem to the original CPE-MAB setting and design PAC and exact algorithms that achieve both the sample complexity similar to that in the CPE-MAB setting (which is nearly optimal for a subclass of problems) and polynomial running time per round. For Condorcet winner, we first design a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for the offline problem of finding the Condorcet winner with known winning probabilities, and then use the FPTAS as an oracle to design a novel pure exploration algorithm sf CAR-sf Cond with sample complexity analysis. sf CAR-sf Cond is the first algorithm with polynomial running time per round for identifying the Condorcet winner in CPE-DB.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 10
- 2023Active Ranking of Experts Based on their Performances in Many Taskscited by 6
- 2022Finding Optimal Arms in Non-stochastic Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-bandit Feedback and Finite Budgetcited by 5
- 2021Combinatorial Pure Exploration with Bottleneck Reward Functioncited by 4
- 2025Clustering Items through Bandit Feedback: Finding the Right Feature out of Manycited by 2
- 2021Pure Exploration with Structured Preference Feedbackcited by 1
- 2021A Fast Algorithm for PAC Combinatorial Pure Explorationcited by 0
- 2026Ranking-and-Selection with Multiple Correct Answers and Non-Answerable Estimatescited by 0
- 2026Ranking-and-Selection with Multiple Correct Answers and Non-Answerable Estimates20 Jun 2026
- 2025Clustering Items through Bandit Feedback: Finding the Right Feature out of Many14 Mar 2025
- 2023Active Ranking of Experts Based on their Performances in Many Tasks5 Jun 2023
- 2022Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets26 Apr 2022
- 2022Finding Optimal Arms in Non-stochastic Combinatorial Bandits with Semi-bandit Feedback and Finite Budget9 Feb 2022
- 2021A Fast Algorithm for PAC Combinatorial Pure Exploration8 Dec 2021
- 2021Pure Exploration with Structured Preference Feedback12 Apr 2021
- 2021Combinatorial Pure Exploration with Bottleneck Reward Function24 Feb 2021