mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Lipschitz Feedback Policies from Expert Demonstrations: Closed-Loop Guarantees, Generalization and Robustness

arXiv 2103.16629 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2021cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we propose a framework to learn feedback control policies with guarantees on closed-loop generalization and adversarial robustness. These policies are learned directly from expert demonstrations, contained in a dataset of state-control input pairs, without any prior knowledge of the task and system model. We use a Lipschitz-constrained loss minimization scheme to learn feedback policies with certified closed-loop robustness, wherein the Lipschitz constraint serves as a mechanism to tune the generalization performance and robustness to adversarial disturbances. Our analysis exploits the Lipschitz property to obtain closed-loop guarantees on generalization and robustness of the learned policies. In particular, we derive a finite sample bound on the policy learning error and establish robust closed-loop stability under the learned control policy. We also derive bounds on the closed-loop regret with respect to the expert policy and the deterioration of closed-loop performance under bounded (adversarial) disturbances to the state measurements. Numerical results validate our analysis and demonstrate the effectiveness of our robust feedback policy learning framework. Finally, our results suggest the existence of a potential tradeoff between nominal closed-loop performance and adversarial robustness, and that improvements in nominal closed-loop performance can only be made at the expense of robustness to adversarial perturbations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2021.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2017End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learningcited by 479
  3. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
  4. 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
  5. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
  6. 2018Discriminator-Actor-Critic: Addressing Sample Inefficiency and Reward Bias in Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 203
  7. 2017DART: Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learningcited by 187
  8. 2018Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks: An Extreme Value Theory Approachcited by 181
  9. 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
  10. 2019Lipschitz Certificates for Layered Network Structures Driven by Averaged Activation Operatorscited by 54
  11. 2016Model-Free Imitation Learning with Policy Optimizationcited by 52
  12. 2019Task-Relevant Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 45
9 more
  1. 2021On the Sample Complexity of Stability Constrained Imitation Learningcited by 38
  2. 2018Stability-certified reinforcement learning: A control-theoretic perspectivecited by 29
  3. 2021CLIP: Cheap Lipschitz Training of Neural Networkscited by 29
  4. 2020Deep Neural Networks with Trainable Activations and Controlled Lipschitz Constantcited by 25
  5. 2019Robust Guarantees for Perception-Based Controlcited by 20
  6. 2020Lipschitz Bounds and Provably Robust Training by Laplacian Smoothingcited by 17
  7. 2016Convergence Properties for Discrete-time Nonlinear Systemscited by 10
  8. 2019Accuracy Prevents Robustness in Perception-based Controlcited by 2
  9. 2019On the Robustness of Data-Driven Controllers for Linear Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.