Guaranteeing Reproducibility in Deep Learning Competitions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To encourage the development of methods with reproducible and robust training behavior, we propose a challenge paradigm where competitors are evaluated directly on the performance of their learning procedures rather than pre-trained agents. Since competition organizers re-train proposed methods in a controlled setting they can guarantee reproducibility, and -- by retraining submissions using a held-out test set -- help ensure generalization past the environments on which they were trained.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021The MineRL 2020 Competition on Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning using Human Priorscited by 40
- 2022MineRL Diamond 2021 Competition: Overview, Results, and Lessons Learnedcited by 26
- 2023Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction as Question Answeringcited by 3
- 2021Towards robust and domain agnostic reinforcement learning competitionscited by 2
- 2023Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction as Question Answering5 Jan 2023
- 2022MineRL Diamond 2021 Competition: Overview, Results, and Lessons Learned17 Feb 2022
- 2021Towards robust and domain agnostic reinforcement learning competitions7 Jun 2021
- 2021The MineRL 2020 Competition on Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning using Human Priors26 Jan 2021