mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optical Flow in Dense Foggy Scenes using Semi-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2004.01905 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2020cs.CVcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In dense foggy scenes, existing optical flow methods are erroneous. This is due to the degradation caused by dense fog particles that break the optical flow basic assumptions such as brightness and gradient constancy. To address the problem, we introduce a semi-supervised deep learning technique that employs real fog images without optical flow ground-truths in the training process. Our network integrates the domain transformation and optical flow networks in one framework. Initially, given a pair of synthetic fog images, its corresponding clean images and optical flow ground-truths, in one training batch we train our network in a supervised manner. Subsequently, given a pair of real fog images and a pair of clean images that are not corresponding to each other (unpaired), in the next training batch, we train our network in an unsupervised manner. We then alternate the training of synthetic and real data iteratively. We use real data without ground-truths, since to have ground-truths in such conditions is intractable, and also to avoid the overfitting problem of synthetic data training, where the knowledge learned on synthetic data cannot be generalized to real data testing. Together with the network architecture design, we propose a new training strategy that combines supervised synthetic-data training and unsupervised real-data training. Experimental results show that our method is effective and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in estimating optical flow in dense foggy scenes.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 8; 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture for Optical Flowcited by 273
  2. 2023VideoFlow: Exploiting Temporal Cues for Multi-frame Optical Flow Estimationcited by 82
  3. 2022Unsupervised Night Image Enhancement: When Layer Decomposition Meets Light-Effects Suppressioncited by 73
  4. 2022DC-ShadowNet: Single-Image Hard and Soft Shadow Removal Using Unsupervised Domain-Classifier Guided Networkcited by 68
  5. 2022Imposing Consistency for Optical Flow Estimationcited by 24
  6. 2021GyroFlow: Gyroscope-Guided Unsupervised Optical Flow Learningcited by 15
  7. 2023Distracting Downpour: Adversarial Weather Attacks for Motion Estimationcited by 15
  8. 2022Optical Flow Training under Limited Label Budget via Active Learningcited by 14
  9. 2023GyroFlow+: Gyroscope-Guided Unsupervised Deep Homography and Optical Flow Learningcited by 10
  10. 2022Semi-Supervised Learning of Optical Flow by Flow Supervisorcited by 9
  11. 2023Optical Flow for Autonomous Driving: Applications, Challenges and Improvementscited by 9
  12. 2023Unsupervised Cumulative Domain Adaptation for Foggy Scene Optical Flowcited by 9
8 more
  1. 2021LIFE: Lighting Invariant Flow Estimationcited by 6
  2. 2022RVSL: Robust Vehicle Similarity Learning in Real Hazy Scenes Based on Semi-supervised Learningcited by 5
  3. 2024Adverse Weather Optical Flow: Cumulative Homogeneous-Heterogeneous Adaptationcited by 4
  4. 2023Unsupervised Hierarchical Domain Adaptation for Adverse Weather Optical Flowcited by 3
  5. 2023FlowFormer: A Transformer Architecture and Its Masked Cost Volume Autoencoding for Optical Flowcited by 3
  6. 2022Complementing Brightness Constancy with Deep Networks for Optical Flow Predictioncited by 1
  7. 2024Rethink Predicting the Optical Flow with the Kinetics Perspectivecited by 0
  8. 2026GenOpticalFlow: A Generative Approach to Unsupervised Optical Flow Learningcited by 0