mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How to Train Your Super-Net: An Analysis of Training Heuristics in Weight-Sharing NAS

arXiv 2003.04276 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Weight sharing promises to make neural architecture search (NAS) tractable even on commodity hardware. Existing methods in this space rely on a diverse set of heuristics to design and train the shared-weight backbone network, a.k.a. the super-net. Since heuristics and hyperparameters substantially vary across different methods, a fair comparison between them can only be achieved by systematically analyzing the influence of these factors. In this paper, we therefore provide a systematic evaluation of the heuristics and hyperparameters that are frequently employed by weight-sharing NAS algorithms. Our analysis uncovers that some commonly-used heuristics for super-net training negatively impact the correlation between super-net and stand-alone performance, and evidences the strong influence of certain hyperparameters and architectural choices. Our code and experiments set a strong and reproducible baseline that future works can build on.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 9; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: