Getting Better from Worse: Augmented Bagging and a Cautionary Tale of Variable Importance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the size, complexity, and availability of data continues to grow, scientists are increasingly relying upon black-box learning algorithms that can often provide accurate predictions with minimal a priori model specifications. Tools like random forests have an established track record of off-the-shelf success and even offer various strategies for analyzing the underlying relationships among variables. Here, motivated by recent insights into random forest behavior, we introduce the simple idea of augmented bagging (AugBagg), a procedure that operates in an identical fashion to classical bagging and random forests, but which operates on a larger, augmented space containing additional randomly generated noise features. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that this simple act of including extra noise variables in the model can lead to dramatic improvements in out-of-sample predictive accuracy, sometimes outperforming even an optimally tuned traditional random forest. As a result, intuitive notions of variable importance based on improved model accuracy may be deeply flawed, as even purely random noise can routinely register as statistically significant. Numerous demonstrations on both real and synthetic data are provided along with a proposed solution.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Trees, Forests, Chickens, and Eggs: When and Why to Prune Trees in a Random Forestcited by 13
- 2021MDA for random forests: inconsistency, and a practical solution via the Sobol-MDAcited by 10
- 2021Bridging Breiman's Brook: From Algorithmic Modeling to Statistical Learningcited by 7
- 2024Randomization Can Reduce Both Bias and Variance: A Case Study in Random Forestscited by 5
- 2026Random Forests as Statistical Procedures: Design, Variance, and Dependencecited by 1
- 2022Sequential Permutation Testing of Random Forest Variable Importance Measurescited by 0
- 2024Global Censored Quantile Random Forestcited by 0
- 2024Targeted Learning for Variable Importancecited by 0
- 2025Targeted tuning of random forests for quantile estimation and prediction intervalscited by 0
- 2026Routing Probes Can Improve Without New Information: An Exact-Null Audit of Uncertainty Beyond Model Outputscited by 0
- 2026Routing Probes Can Improve Without New Information: An Exact-Null Audit of Uncertainty Beyond Model Outputs30 Sep 2026
- 2026Random Forests as Statistical Procedures: Design, Variance, and Dependence13 Feb 2026
- 2025Targeted tuning of random forests for quantile estimation and prediction intervals2 Jul 2025
- 2024Targeted Learning for Variable Importance4 Nov 2024
- 2024Global Censored Quantile Random Forest16 Oct 2024
- 2024Randomization Can Reduce Both Bias and Variance: A Case Study in Random Forests20 Feb 2024
- 2022Sequential Permutation Testing of Random Forest Variable Importance Measures2 Jun 2022
- 2021Trees, Forests, Chickens, and Eggs: When and Why to Prune Trees in a Random Forest30 Mar 2021
- 2021MDA for random forests: inconsistency, and a practical solution via the Sobol-MDA26 Feb 2021
- 2021Bridging Breiman's Brook: From Algorithmic Modeling to Statistical Learning23 Feb 2021