mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Targeted tuning of random forests for quantile estimation and prediction intervals

arXiv 2507.01430 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2025stat.ME stat.AP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a novel tuning procedure for random forests (RFs) that improves the accuracy of estimated quantiles and produces valid, relatively narrow prediction intervals. While RFs are typically used to estimate mean responses (conditional on covariates), they can also be used to estimate quantiles by estimating the full distribution of the response. However, standard approaches for building RFs often result in excessively biased quantile estimates. To reduce this bias, our proposed tuning procedure minimizes "quantile coverage loss" (QCL), which we define as the estimated bias of the marginal quantile coverage probability estimate based on the out-of-bag sample. We adapt QCL tuning to handle censored data and demonstrate its use with random survival forests. We show that QCL tuning results in quantile estimates with more accurate coverage probabilities than those achieved using default parameter values or traditional tuning (using MSPE for uncensored data and C-index for censored data), while also reducing the estimated MSE of these coverage probabilities. We discuss how the superior performance of QCL tuning is linked to its alignment with the estimation goal. Finally, we explore the validity and width of prediction intervals created using this method.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2025.

Builds on

13 of 37 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
  2. 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
  3. 2015A Random Forest Guided Tourcited by 168
  4. 2014Consistency of random forestscited by 84
  5. 2018Hyperparameters and Tuning Strategies for Random Forestcited by 83
  6. 2019Randomization as Regularization: A Degrees of Freedom Explanation for Random Forest Successcited by 30
  7. 2013Narrowing the Gap: Random Forests In Theory and In Practicecited by 17
  8. 2015On the use of Harrell's C for clinical risk prediction via random survival forestscited by 14
  9. 2021Trees, Forests, Chickens, and Eggs: When and Why to Prune Trees in a Random Forestcited by 13
  10. 2020Getting Better from Worse: Augmented Bagging and a Cautionary Tale of Variable Importancecited by 10
  11. 2018Optimizing Prediction Intervals by Tuning Random Forest via Meta-Validationcited by 9
  12. 2022Extremal Random Forestscited by 9
1 more
  1. 2024Alpha-Trimming: Locally Adaptive Tree Pruning for Random Forestscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.