mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimistic Exploration even with a Pessimistic Initialisation

arXiv 2002.12174 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2020cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optimistic initialisation is an effective strategy for efficient exploration in reinforcement learning (RL). In the tabular case, all provably efficient model-free algorithms rely on it. However, model-free deep RL algorithms do not use optimistic initialisation despite taking inspiration from these provably efficient tabular algorithms. In particular, in scenarios with only positive rewards, Q-values are initialised at their lowest possible values due to commonly used network initialisation schemes, a pessimistic initialisation. Merely initialising the network to output optimistic Q-values is not enough, since we cannot ensure that they remain optimistic for novel state-action pairs, which is crucial for exploration. We propose a simple count-based augmentation to pessimistically initialised Q-values that separates the source of optimism from the neural network. We show that this scheme is provably efficient in the tabular setting and extend it to the deep RL setting. Our algorithm, Optimistic Pessimistically Initialised Q-Learning (OPIQ), augments the Q-value estimates of a DQN-based agent with count-derived bonuses to ensure optimism during both action selection and bootstrapping. We show that OPIQ outperforms non-optimistic DQN variants that utilise a pseudocount-based intrinsic motivation in hard exploration tasks, and that it predicts optimistic estimates for novel state-action pairs.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 4.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
  2. 2021A Survey of Exploration Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  3. 2021Cooperative Exploration for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
  4. 2022Optimal Conservative Offline RL with General Function Approximation via Augmented Lagrangiancited by 29
  5. 2023Flipping Coins to Estimate Pseudocounts for Exploration in Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  6. 2021Principled Exploration via Optimistic Bootstrapping and Backward Inductioncited by 26
  7. 2021Decoupled Reinforcement Learning to Stabilise Intrinsically-Motivated Explorationcited by 25
  8. 2021Dynamic Bottleneck for Robust Self-Supervised Explorationcited by 21
  9. 2025Synthesis of Model Predictive Control and Reinforcement Learning: Survey and Classificationcited by 19
  10. 2021Dealing with the Unknown: Pessimistic Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  11. 2022Pretraining in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 18
  12. 2023Posterior Sampling for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
13 more
  1. 2021Decoupled Exploration and Exploitation Policies for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  2. 2021No-Regret Reinforcement Learning with Heavy-Tailed Rewardscited by 13
  3. 2022Learning to Act with Affordance-Aware Multimodal Neural SLAMcited by 8
  4. 2023Offline Retraining for Online RL: Decoupled Policy Learning to Mitigate Exploration Biascited by 7
  5. 2021Optimistic Reinforcement Learning by Forward Kullback-Leibler Divergence Optimizationcited by 6
  6. 2022Optimistic Curiosity Exploration and Conservative Exploitation with Linear Reward Shapingcited by 6
  7. 2025The Courage to Stop: Overcoming Sunk Cost Fallacy in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  8. 2021An Open-Source Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning Environment for Robotic Manipulation with Pybulletcited by 5
  9. 2023Conditionally Optimistic Exploration for Cooperative Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  10. 2022Slowly Changing Adversarial Bandit Algorithms are Efficient for Discounted MDPscited by 2
  11. 2021Balancing Value Underestimation and Overestimation with Realistic Actor-Criticcited by 1
  12. 2025Exploration by Random Distribution Distillationcited by 1
  13. 2025Universal Value-Function Uncertaintiescited by 1