A Differentially Private Framework for Deep Learning with Convexified Loss Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differential privacy (DP) has been applied in deep learning for preserving privacy of the underlying training sets. Existing DP practice falls into three categories - objective perturbation, gradient perturbation and output perturbation. They suffer from three main problems. First, conditions on objective functions limit objective perturbation in general deep learning tasks. Second, gradient perturbation does not achieve a satisfactory privacy-utility trade-off due to over-injected noise in each epoch. Third, high utility of the output perturbation method is not guaranteed because of the loose upper bound on the global sensitivity of the trained model parameters as the noise scale parameter. To address these problems, we analyse a tighter upper bound on the global sensitivity of the model parameters. Under a black-box setting, based on this global sensitivity, to control the overall noise injection, we propose a novel output perturbation framework by injecting DP noise into a randomly sampled neuron (via the exponential mechanism) at the output layer of a baseline non-private neural network trained with a convexified loss function. We empirically compare the privacy-utility trade-off, measured by accuracy loss to baseline non-private models and the privacy leakage against black-box membership inference (MI) attacks, between our framework and the open-source differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) approaches on six commonly used real-world datasets. The experimental evaluations show that, when the baseline models have observable privacy leakage under MI attacks, our framework achieves a better privacy-utility trade-off than existing DP-SGD implementations, given an overall privacy budget ε ≤ 1 for a large number of queries.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2022.
Builds on
14 of 32 references.
References · 14
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 413
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 266
- 2018Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learningcited by 75
- 2019Interpretable and Differentially Private Predictionscited by 28
- 2019Effects of Differential Privacy and Data Skewness on Membership Inference Vulnerabilitycited by 15
- 2020Data and Model Dependencies of Membership Inference Attackcited by 10
2 more
- 2017Preserving Differential Privacy in Convolutional Deep Belief Networkscited by 9
- 2014Universal Convexification via Risk-Aversioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Directional Privacy for Deep Learningcited by 1
- 2023Differentially Private Topological Data Analysiscited by 1
- 2022Additive Logistic Mechanism for Privacy-Preserving Self-Supervised Learningcited by 0
- 2023Practical, Private Assurance of the Value of Collaboration via Fully Homomorphic Encryptioncited by 0
- 2023Practical, Private Assurance of the Value of Collaboration via Fully Homomorphic Encryption4 Oct 2023
- 2023Differentially Private Topological Data Analysis5 May 2023
- 2022Directional Privacy for Deep Learning9 Nov 2022
- 2022Additive Logistic Mechanism for Privacy-Preserving Self-Supervised Learning25 May 2022