mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Control Frequency Adaptation via Action Persistence in Batch Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2002.06836 ↗First posted 17 Feb 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The choice of the control frequency of a system has a relevant impact on the ability of reinforcement learning algorithms to learn a highly performing policy. In this paper, we introduce the notion of action persistence that consists in the repetition of an action for a fixed number of decision steps, having the effect of modifying the control frequency. We start analyzing how action persistence affects the performance of the optimal policy, and then we present a novel algorithm, Persistent Fitted Q-Iteration (PFQI), that extends FQI, with the goal of learning the optimal value function at a given persistence. After having provided a theoretical study of PFQI and a heuristic approach to identify the optimal persistence, we present an experimental campaign on benchmark domains to show the advantages of action persistence and proving the effectiveness of our persistence selection method.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 9; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021TempoRL: Learning When to Actcited by 25
  2. 2021Time Discretization-Invariant Safe Action Repetition for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 21
  3. 2022Delayed Reinforcement Learning by Imitationcited by 15
  4. 2021TAAC: Temporally Abstract Actor-Critic for Continuous Controlcited by 14
  5. 2023Learning to Configure Separators in Branch-and-Cutcited by 14
  6. 2022Dynamic Decision Frequency with Continuous Optionscited by 11
  7. 2021Addressing Action Oscillations through Learning Policy Inertiacited by 8
  8. 2023Temporal Transfer Learning for Traffic Optimization with Coarse-grained Advisory Autonomycited by 6
  9. 2024No-Regret Reinforcement Learning in Smooth MDPscited by 6
  10. 2021Towards Automatic Actor-Critic Solutions to Continuous Controlcited by 4
  11. 2023PeRP: Personalized Residual Policies For Congestion Mitigation Through Co-operative Advisory Systemscited by 4
  12. 2024Local Linearity: the Key for No-regret Reinforcement Learning in Continuous MDPscited by 4
15 more
  1. 2024Learning Uncertainty-Aware Temporally-Extended Actionscited by 3
  2. 2022Simultaneously Updating All Persistence Values in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  3. 2024Reinforcement Learning with Elastic Time Stepscited by 2
  4. 2024MOSEAC: Streamlined Variable Time Step Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  5. 2022Managing Temporal Resolution in Continuous Value Estimation: A Fundamental Trade-offcited by 1
  6. 2023Actor-Critic with variable time discretization via sustained actionscited by 1
  7. 2024Performance Improvement Bounds for Lipschitz Configurable Markov Decision Processescited by 1
  8. 2024State-Novelty Guided Action Persistence in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  9. 2026When to Plan: Learning to Select Between Reactive Control and Deliberative Planningcited by 1
  10. 2021Learning Routines for Effective Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  11. 2024Exploiting Risk-Aversion and Size-dependent fees in FX Trading with Fitted Natural Actor-Criticcited by 0
  12. 2024Inverse Delayed Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  13. 2025TARC: Time-Adaptive Robotic Controlcited by 0
  14. 2026Timescale Separation Enables Deep Reinforcement Learning Control of Rotating Detonation Engine Mode Transitionscited by 0
  15. 2026Latent Telepathy: Multi-Robot Communication with Self-Supervised Perceptual Latentscited by 0