Contrast Trees and Distribution Boosting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Often machine learning methods are applied and results reported in cases where there is little to no information concerning accuracy of the output. Simply because a computer program returns a result does not insure its validity. If decisions are to be made based on such results it is important to have some notion of their veracity. Contrast trees represent a new approach for assessing the accuracy of many types of machine learning estimates that are not amenable to standard (cross) validation methods. In situations where inaccuracies are detected boosted contrast trees can often improve performance. A special case, distribution boosting, provides an assumption free method for estimating the full probability distribution of an outcome variable given any set of joint input predictor variable values.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Conformalized Survival Analysiscited by 53
- 2022Adversarial random forests for density estimation and generative modelingcited by 44
- 2022A review of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learningcited by 29
- 2024Boosted Conformal Prediction Intervalscited by 27
- 2022Distributional Gradient Boosting Machinescited by 6
- 2024Boosted Conformal Prediction Intervals11 Jun 2024
- 2022A review of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learning17 Sep 2022
- 2022Adversarial random forests for density estimation and generative modeling19 May 2022
- 2022Distributional Gradient Boosting Machines2 Apr 2022
- 2021Conformalized Survival Analysis17 Mar 2021