Making Learners (More) Monotone
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning performance can show non-monotonic behavior. That is, more data does not necessarily lead to better models, even on average. We propose three algorithms that take a supervised learning model and make it perform more monotone. We prove consistency and monotonicity with high probability, and evaluate the algorithms on scenarios where non-monotone behaviour occurs. Our proposed algorithm MTHT makes less than 1% non-monotone decisions on MNIST while staying competitive in terms of error rate compared to several baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Reviewcited by 67
- 2022Learning Curves for Decision Making in Supervised Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 27
- 2022Monotone Learningcited by 9
- 2022A Survey of Learning Curves with Bad Behavior: or How More Data Need Not Lead to Better Performancecited by 2
- 2025Monotonic Learning in the PAC Framework: A New Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Risk reversal for least squares estimators under nested convex constraintscited by 0
- 2026Risk reversal for least squares estimators under nested convex constraints22 Jan 2026
- 2025Monotonic Learning in the PAC Framework: A New Perspective9 Jan 2025
- 2022A Survey of Learning Curves with Bad Behavior: or How More Data Need Not Lead to Better Performance25 Nov 2022
- 2022Monotone Learning10 Feb 2022
- 2022Learning Curves for Decision Making in Supervised Machine Learning: A Survey28 Jan 2022
- 2021The Shape of Learning Curves: a Review19 Mar 2021