mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Question Answering can Learn from Trivia Nerds

arXiv 1910.14464 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2019cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In addition to the traditional task of getting machines to answer questions, a major research question in question answering is to create interesting, challenging questions that can help systems learn how to answer questions and also reveal which systems are the best at answering questions. We argue that creating a question answering dataset -- and the ubiquitous leaderboard that goes with it -- closely resembles running a trivia tournament: you write questions, have agents (either humans or machines) answer the questions, and declare a winner. However, the research community has ignored the decades of hard-learned lessons from decades of the trivia community creating vibrant, fair, and effective question answering competitions. After detailing problems with existing QA datasets, we outline the key lessons -- removing ambiguity, discriminating skill, and adjudicating disputes -- that can transfer to QA research and how they might be implemented for the QA community.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variantscited by 300
  2. 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 200
  3. 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehensioncited by 91
  4. 2022FiD-Light: Efficient and Effective Retrieval-Augmented Text Generationcited by 63
  5. 2021NeurIPS 2020 EfficientQA Competition: Systems, Analyses and Lessons Learnedcited by 52
  6. 2025Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Abovecited by 51
  7. 2021Fool Me Twice: Entailment from Wikipedia Gamificationcited by 50
  8. 2021What's in a Name? Answer Equivalence For Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 21
  9. 2023PaniniQA: Enhancing Patient Education Through Interactive Question Answeringcited by 21
  10. 2025Is That Your Final Answer? Test-Time Scaling Improves Selective Question Answeringcited by 17
  11. 2021A Survey on Deep Learning Event Extraction: Approaches and Applicationscited by 12
  12. 2024Accurate and Nuanced Open-QA Evaluation Through Textual Entailmentcited by 12
9 more
  1. 2022RAAT: Relation-Augmented Attention Transformer for Relation Modeling in Document-Level Event Extractioncited by 8
  2. 2023Capturing Humans' Mental Models of AI: An Item Response Theory Approachcited by 8
  3. 2021Toward Deconfounding the Influence of Entity Demographics for Question Answering Accuracycited by 5
  4. 2021A Russian Jeopardy! Data Set for Question-Answering Systemscited by 3
  5. 2022Fighting FIRe with FIRE: Assessing the Validity of Text-to-Video Retrieval Benchmarkscited by 1
  6. 2023On Degrees of Freedom in Defining and Testing Natural Language Understandingcited by 1
  7. 2024How the Advent of Ubiquitous Large Language Models both Stymie and Turbocharge Dynamic Adversarial Question Generationcited by 1
  8. 2026AUDITA: A New Dataset to Audit Humans vs. AI Skill at Audio QAcited by 1
  9. 2024CFMatch: Aligning Automated Answer Equivalence Evaluation with Expert Judgments For Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 0