mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transfer Reward Learning for Policy Gradient-Based Text Generation

arXiv 1909.03622 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2019cs.LG cs.CL cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Task-specific scores are often used to optimize for and evaluate the performance of conditional text generation systems. However, such scores are non-differentiable and cannot be used in the standard supervised learning paradigm. Hence, policy gradient methods are used since the gradient can be computed without requiring a differentiable objective. However, we argue that current n-gram overlap based measures that are used as rewards can be improved by using model-based rewards transferred from tasks that directly compare the similarity of sentence pairs. These reward models either output a score of sentence-level syntactic and semantic similarity between entire predicted and target sentences as the expected return, or for intermediate phrases as segmented accumulative rewards. We demonstrate that using a textitTransferable Reward Learner leads to improved results on semantical evaluation measures in policy-gradient models for image captioning tasks. Our InferSent actor-critic model improves over a BLEU trained actor-critic model on MSCOCO when evaluated on a Word Mover's Distance similarity measure by 6.97 points, also improving on a Sliding Window Cosine Similarity measure by 10.48 points. Similar performance improvements are also obtained on the smaller Flickr-30k dataset, demonstrating the general applicability of the proposed transfer learning method.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2019.

Builds on

25 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  6. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  7. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  8. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  9. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  10. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  11. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  12. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
12 more
  1. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
  2. 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 321
  3. 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 158
  4. 2014Reinforcement and Imitation Learning via Interactive No-Regret Learningcited by 116
  5. 2014Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)cited by 94
  6. 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
  7. 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
  8. 2016Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering Based on Attributes and External Knowledgecited by 44
  9. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Image Captioning with Embedding Rewardcited by 39
  10. 2016Attention Correctness in Neural Image Captioningcited by 35
  11. 2017Actor-Critic Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 13
  12. 2017Softmax Q-Distribution Estimation for Structured Prediction: A Theoretical Interpretation for RAMLcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025PoLi-RL: A Point-to-List Reinforcement Learning Framework for Conditional Semantic Textual Similarity
  2. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences
  3. 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
  4. 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation
  5. 2024Subject-driven Text-to-Image Generation via Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Towards Cost-Effective Reward Guided Text Generation
  7. 2025Text2Grad: Reinforcement Learning from Natural Language Feedback
  8. 2017Reinforced Video Captioning with Entailment Rewards