Transfer Reward Learning for Policy Gradient-Based Text Generation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Task-specific scores are often used to optimize for and evaluate the performance of conditional text generation systems. However, such scores are non-differentiable and cannot be used in the standard supervised learning paradigm. Hence, policy gradient methods are used since the gradient can be computed without requiring a differentiable objective. However, we argue that current n-gram overlap based measures that are used as rewards can be improved by using model-based rewards transferred from tasks that directly compare the similarity of sentence pairs. These reward models either output a score of sentence-level syntactic and semantic similarity between entire predicted and target sentences as the expected return, or for intermediate phrases as segmented accumulative rewards. We demonstrate that using a textitTransferable Reward Learner leads to improved results on semantical evaluation measures in policy-gradient models for image captioning tasks. Our InferSent actor-critic model improves over a BLEU trained actor-critic model on MSCOCO when evaluated on a Word Mover's Distance similarity measure by 6.97 points, also improving on a Sliding Window Cosine Similarity measure by 10.48 points. Similar performance improvements are also obtained on the smaller Flickr-30k dataset, demonstrating the general applicability of the proposed transfer learning method.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2019.
Builds on
25 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
12 more
- 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 483
- 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 321
- 2016An Actor-Critic Algorithm for Sequence Predictioncited by 158
- 2014Reinforcement and Imitation Learning via Interactive No-Regret Learningcited by 116
- 2014Deep Captioning with Multimodal Recurrent Neural Networks (m-RNN)cited by 94
- 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
- 2018Learning to Evaluate Image Captioningcited by 53
- 2016Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering Based on Attributes and External Knowledgecited by 44
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Image Captioning with Embedding Rewardcited by 39
- 2016Attention Correctness in Neural Image Captioningcited by 35
- 2017Actor-Critic Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 13
- 2017Softmax Q-Distribution Estimation for Structured Prediction: A Theoretical Interpretation for RAMLcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PoLi-RL: A Point-to-List Reinforcement Learning Framework for Conditional Semantic Textual Similarity
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences
- 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
- 2024A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation
- 2024Subject-driven Text-to-Image Generation via Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Towards Cost-Effective Reward Guided Text Generation
- 2025Text2Grad: Reinforcement Learning from Natural Language Feedback
- 2017Reinforced Video Captioning with Entailment Rewards