Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for Clinical Text Anonymization: A Comparative Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated clinical text anonymization has the potential to unlock the widespread sharing of textual health data for secondary usage while assuring patient privacy and safety. Despite the proposal of many complex and theoretically successful anonymization solutions in literature, these techniques remain flawed. As such, clinical institutions are still reluctant to apply them for open access to their data. Recent advances in developing Large Language Models (LLMs) pose a promising opportunity to further the field, given their capability to perform various tasks. This paper proposes six new evaluation metrics tailored to the challenges of generative anonymization with LLMs. Moreover, we present a comparative study of LLM-based methods, testing them against two baseline techniques. Our results establish LLM-based models as a reliable alternative to common approaches, paving the way toward trustworthy anonymization of clinical text.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.
Builds on
13 of 37 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2022The Text Anonymization Benchmark (TAB): A Dedicated Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Text Anonymizationcited by 94
- 2016De-identification of Patient Notes with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 88
- 2024Large Language Models are Advanced Anonymizerscited by 22
- 2019Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving Text Representations for De-Identification of Medical Recordscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymizationcited by 5
- 2025Not What the Doctor Ordered: Surveying LLM-based De-identification and Quantifying Clinical Information Losscited by 3
- 2026Towards Fair and Efficient De-identification: Quantifying the Efficiency and Generalizability of De-identification Approachescited by 1
- 2025Evaluating Apple Intelligence's Writing Tools for Privacy Against Large Language Model-Based Inference Attacks: Insights from Early Datasetscited by 0
- 2025Protecting De-identified Documents from Search-based Linkage Attackscited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private De-identification of Dutch Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Institution-Specific LLM Prompting Recovers PHI That De-identification Systems and Their Gold Standards Both Misscited by 0
- 2026Institution-Specific LLM Prompting Recovers PHI That De-identification Systems and Their Gold Standards Both Miss17 Aug 2026
- 2026Differentially Private De-identification of Dutch Clinical Notes: A Comparative Evaluation23 Apr 2026
- 2026Towards Fair and Efficient De-identification: Quantifying the Efficiency and Generalizability of De-identification Approaches27 Jan 2026
- 2025Protecting De-identified Documents from Search-based Linkage Attacks7 Oct 2025
- 2025Not What the Doctor Ordered: Surveying LLM-based De-identification and Quantifying Clinical Information Loss17 Sep 2025
- 2025A Survey on Current Trends and Recent Advances in Text Anonymization29 Aug 2025
- 2025Evaluating Apple Intelligence's Writing Tools for Privacy Against Large Language Model-Based Inference Attacks: Insights from Early Datasets4 Jun 2025