mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpreting Adversarial Examples by Activation Promotion and Suppression

arXiv 1904.02057 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2019cs.CV cs.AIcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is widely known that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples: images with imperceptible perturbations crafted to fool classifiers. However, interpretability of these perturbations is less explored in the literature. This work aims to better understand the roles of adversarial perturbations and provide visual explanations from pixel, image and network perspectives. We show that adversaries have a promotion-suppression effect (PSE) on neurons' activations and can be primarily categorized into three types: i) suppression-dominated perturbations that mainly reduce the classification score of the true label, ii) promotion-dominated perturbations that focus on boosting the confidence of the target label, and iii) balanced perturbations that play a dual role in suppression and promotion. We also provide image-level interpretability of adversarial examples. This links PSE of pixel-level perturbations to class-specific discriminative image regions localized by class activation mapping (Zhou et al. 2016). Further, we examine the adversarial effect through network dissection (Bau et al. 2017), which offers concept-level interpretability of hidden units. We show that there exists a tight connection between the units' sensitivity to adversarial attacks and their interpretability on semantic concepts. Lastly, we provide some new insights from our interpretation to improve the adversarial robustness of networks.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
  2. 2021Improving Adversarial Robustness via Channel-wise Activation Suppressingcited by 76
  3. 2021CIFS: Improving Adversarial Robustness of CNNs via Channel-wise Importance-based Feature Selectioncited by 21
  4. 2021A Unified Game-Theoretic Interpretation of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 17
  5. 2022Reverse Engineering of Imperceptible Adversarial Image Perturbationscited by 17
  6. 2023Feature Separation and Recalibration for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 16
  7. 2021MixACM: Mixup-Based Robustness Transfer via Distillation of Activated Channel Mapscited by 9
  8. 2021What Do Deep Nets Learn? Class-wise Patterns Revealed in the Input Spacecited by 8
  9. 2022An Adversarial Robustness Perspective on the Topology of Neural Networkscited by 3
  10. 2024Improving Adversarial Robustness via Decoupled Visual Representation Maskingcited by 2
  11. 2024CausAdv: A Causal-based Framework for Detecting Adversarial Examplescited by 2
  12. 2023Can Adversarial Examples Be Parsed to Reveal Victim Model Information?cited by 1
5 more
  1. 2023Towards Black-box Adversarial Example Detection: A Data Reconstruction-based Methodcited by 1
  2. 2025SALVE: Sparse Autoencoder-Latent Vector Editing for Mechanistic Control of Neural Networkscited by 1
  3. 2021A Unified Game-Theoretic Interpretation of Adversarial Robustnesscited by 0
  4. 2021Visualizing Representations of Adversarially Perturbed Inputscited by 0
  5. 2025Beyond Output Faithfulness: Learning Attributions that Preserve Computational Pathwayscited by 0