Weisfeiler and Leman go sparse: Towards scalable higher-order graph embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph kernels based on the 1-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm and corresponding neural architectures recently emerged as powerful tools for (supervised) learning with graphs. However, due to the purely local nature of the algorithms, they might miss essential patterns in the given data and can only handle binary relations. The k-dimensional Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm addresses this by considering k-tuples, defined over the set of vertices, and defines a suitable notion of adjacency between these vertex tuples. Hence, it accounts for the higher-order interactions between vertices. However, it does not scale and may suffer from overfitting when used in a machine learning setting. Hence, it remains an important open problem to design WL-based graph learning methods that are simultaneously expressive, scalable, and non-overfitting. Here, we propose local variants and corresponding neural architectures, which consider a subset of the original neighborhood, making them more scalable, and less prone to overfitting. The expressive power of (one of) our algorithms is strictly higher than the original algorithm, in terms of ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs. Our experimental study confirms that the local algorithms, both kernel and neural architectures, lead to vastly reduced computation times, and prevent overfitting. The kernel version establishes a new state-of-the-art for graph classification on a wide range of benchmark datasets, while the neural version shows promising performance on large-scale molecular regression tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Weisfeiler and Leman go Machine Learning: The Story so farcited by 122
- 2023Rethinking the Expressive Power of GNNs via Graph Biconnectivitycited by 119
- 2021Reconstruction for Powerful Graph Representationscited by 65
- 2023A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Testscited by 64
- 2022A Short Tutorial on The Weisfeiler-Lehman Test And Its Variantscited by 52
- 2024Beyond Weisfeiler-Lehman: A Quantitative Framework for GNN Expressivenesscited by 39
- 2022Towards Better Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Neural Algorithmic Reasoning Taskscited by 30
- 2022Variational Graph Generator for Multi-View Graph Clusteringcited by 7
- 2022Bayesian Deep Learning for Graphscited by 0
- 2024Beyond Weisfeiler-Lehman: A Quantitative Framework for GNN Expressiveness16 Jan 2024
- 2023A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Tests14 Feb 2023
- 2023Rethinking the Expressive Power of GNNs via Graph Biconnectivity23 Jan 2023
- 2022Towards Better Out-of-Distribution Generalization of Neural Algorithmic Reasoning Tasks1 Nov 2022
- 2022Variational Graph Generator for Multi-View Graph Clustering13 Oct 2022
- 2022Bayesian Deep Learning for Graphs24 Feb 2022
- 2022A Short Tutorial on The Weisfeiler-Lehman Test And Its Variants18 Jan 2022
- 2021Weisfeiler and Leman go Machine Learning: The Story so far18 Dec 2021
- 2021Reconstruction for Powerful Graph Representations1 Oct 2021