Evaluating In-Context Translation with Synchronous Context-Free Grammar Transduction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Low-resource languages pose a challenge for machine translation with large language models (LLMs), which require large amounts of training data. One potential way to circumvent this data dependence is to rely on LLMs' ability to use in-context descriptions of languages, like textbooks and dictionaries. To do so, LLMs must be able to infer the link between the languages' grammatical descriptions and the sentences in question. Here we isolate this skill using a formal analogue of the task: string transduction based on a formal grammar provided in-context. We construct synchronous context-free grammars which define pairs of formal languages designed to model particular aspects of natural language grammar, morphology, and written representation. Using these grammars, we measure how well LLMs can translate sentences from one formal language into another when given both the grammar and the source-language sentence. We vary the size of the grammar, the lengths of the sentences, the syntactic and morphological properties of the languages, and their written script. We note three key findings. First, LLMs' translation accuracy decreases markedly as a function of grammar size and sentence length. Second, differences in morphology and written representation between the source and target languages can strongly diminish model performance. Third, we examine the types of errors committed by models and find they are most prone to recall the wrong words from the target language vocabulary, hallucinate new words, or leave source-language words untranslated.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
- 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2024Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontiercited by 121
- 2024Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queriescited by 85
- 2023A Benchmark for Learning to Translate a New Language from One Grammar Bookcited by 74
- 2020When and Why is Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation Useless?cited by 34
6 more
- 2024Can LLMs Really Learn to Translate a Low-Resource Language from One Grammar Book?cited by 23
- 2019Using Monolingual Data in Neural Machine Translation: a Systematic Studycited by 21
- 2019Generalizing Back-Translation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 18
- 2025SMOL: Professionally translated parallel data for 115 under-represented languagescited by 11
- 2019Extract and Edit: An Alternative to Back-Translation for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
- 2026Omnilingual MT: Machine Translation for 1,600 Languagescited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.