mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Estimating the Mixing Time of Ergodic Markov Chains

arXiv 1902.01224 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2019math.ST cs.LG stat.MLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address the problem of estimating the mixing time t_mathsfmix of an arbitrary ergodic finite-state Markov chain from a single trajectory of length m. The reversible case was addressed by Hsu et al. [2019], who left the general case as an open problem. In the reversible case, the analysis is greatly facilitated by the fact that the Markov operator is self-adjoint, and Weyl's inequality allows for a dimension-free perturbation analysis of the empirical eigenvalues. As Hsu et al. point out, in the absence of reversibility (which induces asymmetric pair probabilities matrices), the existing perturbation analysis has a worst-case exponential dependence on the number of states d. Furthermore, even if an eigenvalue perturbation analysis with better dependence on d were available, in the non-reversible case the connection between the spectral gap and the mixing time is not nearly as straightforward as in the reversible case. Our key insight is to estimate the pseudo-spectral gap γ_mathsfps instead, which allows us to overcome the loss of symmetry and to achieve a polynomial dependence on the minimal stationary probability π_star and γ_mathsfps. Additionally, in the reversible case, we obtain simultaneous nearly (up to logarithmic factors) minimax rates in t_mathsfmix and precision varepsilon, closing a gap in Hsu et al., who treated varepsilon as constant in the lower bounds. Finally, we construct fully empirical confidence intervals for γ_mathsfps, which shrink to zero at a rate of roughly 1/√m, and improve the state of the art in even the reversible case.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 6; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Adapting to Mixing Time in Stochastic Optimization with Markovian Datacited by 35
  2. 2022Stochastic first-order methods for average-reward Markov decision processescited by 30
  3. 2025Metastable Dynamics of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: Provable Benefits of Search, RL and Distillationcited by 25
  4. 2021Accelerated and instance-optimal policy evaluation with linear function approximationcited by 18
  5. 2022On Rademacher Complexity-based Generalization Bounds for Deep Learningcited by 16
  6. 2024A Simple Finite-Time Analysis of TD Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 15
  7. 2023First Order Methods with Markovian Noise: from Acceleration to Variational Inequalitiescited by 14
  8. 2021Generalization Error Bounds on Deep Learning with Markov Datasetscited by 9
  9. 2023Streaming PCA for Markovian Datacited by 9
  10. 2023Spectral Entry-wise Matrix Estimation for Low-Rank Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  11. 2022Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Q-learning under Diminishing Step-Size from Control-Theoretic Viewcited by 4
  12. 2024Conformal Predictions under Markovian Datacited by 4
12 more
  1. 2022Hardness in Markov Decision Processes: Theory and Practicecited by 3
  2. 2021On the α-lazy version of Markov chains in estimation and testing problemscited by 2
  3. 2024Estimating the Mixing Coefficients of Geometrically Ergodic Markov Processescited by 2
  4. 2025Empirical PAC-Bayes Bounds for Markov Chainscited by 2
  5. 2025Auto-exploration for online reinforcement learningcited by 2
  6. 2022Generalization Bounds on Multi-Kernel Learning with Mixed Datasetscited by 1
  7. 2023Generalization for slowly mixing processescited by 1
  8. 2025Near-Optimal Clustering in Mixture of Markov Chainscited by 1
  9. 2025Central Limit Theorems for Transition Probabilities of Controlled Markov Chainscited by 1
  10. 2025Corruption-Tolerant Asynchronous Q-Learning with Near-Optimal Ratescited by 1
  11. 2023Variable-Complexity Weighted-Tempered Gibbs Samplers for Bayesian Variable Selectioncited by 0
  12. 2026How Wrong Can a Good Predictor Be? Diverging Updates with Vanishing Predictive KLcited by 0