SAT-based Explicit LTLf Satisfiability Checking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present here a SAT-based framework for LTLf (Linear Temporal Logic on Finite Traces) satisfiability checking. We use propositional SAT-solving techniques to construct a transition system for the input LTLf formula; satisfiability checking is then reduced to a path-search problem over this transition system. Furthermore, we introduce CDLSC (Conflict-Driven LTLf Satisfiability Checking), a novel algorithm that leverages information produced by propositional SAT solvers from both satisfiability and unsatisfiability results. Experimental evaluations show that CDLSC outperforms all other existing approaches for LTLf satisfiability checking, by demonstrating an approximate four-fold speedup compared to the second-best solver.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3.
6 papers.
- 2023Decidable Fragments of LTLf Modulo Theories (Extended Version)cited by 5
- 2023Forward LTLf Synthesis: DPLL At Workcited by 4
- 2022Computing unsatisfiable cores for LTLf specificationscited by 3
- 2024LTLf Synthesis on First-Order Agent Programs in Nondeterministic Environmentscited by 1
- 2024On-the-fly Synthesis for LTL over Finite Traces: An Efficient Approach that Countscited by 0
- 2024Enumerating Minimal Unsatisfiable Cores of LTLf formulascited by 0
- 2024LTLf Synthesis on First-Order Agent Programs in Nondeterministic Environments1 Oct 2024
- 2024Enumerating Minimal Unsatisfiable Cores of LTLf formulas14 Sep 2024
- 2024On-the-fly Synthesis for LTL over Finite Traces: An Efficient Approach that Counts14 Aug 2024
- 2023Decidable Fragments of LTLf Modulo Theories (Extended Version)31 Jul 2023
- 2023Forward LTLf Synthesis: DPLL At Work27 Feb 2023
- 2022Computing unsatisfiable cores for LTLf specifications9 Mar 2022