mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Computing unsatisfiable cores for LTLf specifications

arXiv 2203.04834 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.LO cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Linear-time temporal logic on finite traces (LTLf) is rapidly becoming a de-facto standard to produce specifications in many application domains (e.g., planning, business process management, run-time monitoring, reactive synthesis). Several studies approached the respective satisfiability problem. In this paper, we investigate the problem of extracting the unsatisfiable core in LTLf specifications. We provide four algorithms for extracting an unsatisfiable core leveraging the adaptation of state-of-the-art approaches to LTLf satisfiability checking. We implement the different approaches within the respective tools and carry out an experimental evaluation on a set of reference benchmarks, restricting to the unsatisfiable ones. The results show the feasibility, effectiveness, and complementarities of the different algorithms and tools.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

7 of 70 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Monitoring Constraints and Metaconstraints with Temporal Logics on Finite Tracescited by 7
  2. 2018SAT-based Explicit LTLf Satisfiability Checkingcited by 6
  3. 2018One-Pass and Tree-Shaped Tableau Systems for TPTL and TPTLb+Pastcited by 4
  4. 2014LTLf satisfiability checkingcited by 3
  5. 2015SAT-based Explicit LTL Reasoningcited by 3
  6. 2014Computing Minimal Sets on Propositional Formulae I: Problems & Reductionscited by 1
  7. 2017Consistency of Property Specification Patterns with Boolean and Constrained Numerical Signalscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.