Progressive Disclosure: Designing for Effective Transparency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As we increasingly delegate important decisions to intelligent systems, it is essential that users understand how algorithmic decisions are made. Prior work has often taken a technocentric approach to transparency. In contrast, we explore empirical user-centric methods to better understand user reactions to transparent systems. We assess user reactions to global and incremental feedback in two studies. In Study 1, users anticipated that the more transparent incremental system would perform better, but retracted this evaluation after experience with the system. Qualitative data suggest this may arise because incremental feedback is distracting and undermines simple heuristics users form about system operation. Study 2 explored these effects in depth, suggesting that users may benefit from initially simplified feedback that hides potential system errors and assists users in building working heuristics about system operation. We use these findings to motivate new progressive disclosure principles for transparency in intelligent systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Nov 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 86
- 2025Improving Human Verification of LLM Reasoning through Interactive Explanation Interfacescited by 7
- 2024OpenHEXAI: An Open-Source Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2025Improving Human Verification of LLM Reasoning through Interactive Explanation Interfaces27 Oct 2025
- 2024OpenHEXAI: An Open-Source Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable Machine Learning20 Feb 2024
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies21 Dec 2021