OpenHEXAI: An Open-Source Framework for Human-Centered Evaluation of Explainable Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, there has been a surge of explainable AI (XAI) methods driven by the need for understanding machine learning model behaviors in high-stakes scenarios. However, properly evaluating the effectiveness of the XAI methods inevitably requires the involvement of human subjects, and conducting human-centered benchmarks is challenging in a number of ways: designing and implementing user studies is complex; numerous design choices in the design space of user study lead to problems of reproducibility; and running user studies can be challenging and even daunting for machine learning researchers. To address these challenges, this paper presents OpenHEXAI, an open-source framework for human-centered evaluation of XAI methods. OpenHEXAI features (1) a collection of diverse benchmark datasets, pre-trained models, and post hoc explanation methods; (2) an easy-to-use web application for user study; (3) comprehensive evaluation metrics for the effectiveness of post hoc explanation methods in the context of human-AI decision making tasks; (4) best practice recommendations of experiment documentation; and (5) convenient tools for power analysis and cost estimation. OpenHEAXI is the first large-scale infrastructural effort to facilitate human-centered benchmarks of XAI methods. It simplifies the design and implementation of user studies for XAI methods, thus allowing researchers and practitioners to focus on the scientific questions. Additionally, it enhances reproducibility through standardized designs. Based on OpenHEXAI, we further conduct a systematic benchmark of four state-of-the-art post hoc explanation methods and compare their impacts on human-AI decision making tasks in terms of accuracy, fairness, as well as users' trust and understanding of the machine learning model.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.
Builds on
30 of 62 references.
References · 30
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
18 more
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
- 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
- 2020Proxy Tasks and Subjective Measures Can Be Misleading in Evaluating Explainable AI Systemscited by 138
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
- 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
- 2018'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisionscited by 91
- 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
- 2021Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studiescited by 85
- 2021Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Makingcited by 58
- 2018Do Explanations make VQA Models more Predictable to a Human?cited by 51
- 2019Why Does My Model Fail? Contrastive Local Explanations for Retail Forecastingcited by 31
- 2021Reusable Templates and Guides For Documenting Datasets and Models for Natural Language Processing and Generation: A Case Study of the HuggingFace and GEM Data and Model Cardscited by 24
- 2019Assessing the Local Interpretability of Machine Learning Modelscited by 23
- 2019A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processingcited by 23
- 2022Use-Case-Grounded Simulations for Explanation Evaluationcited by 19
- 2022ExSum: From Local Explanations to Model Understandingcited by 15
- 2022A Psychological Theory of Explainabilitycited by 10
- 2018Progressive Disclosure: Designing for Effective Transparencycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.