Modeling human intuitions about liquid flow with particle-based simulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Humans can easily describe, imagine, and, crucially, predict a wide variety of behaviors of liquids--splashing, squirting, gushing, sloshing, soaking, dripping, draining, trickling, pooling, and pouring--despite tremendous variability in their material and dynamical properties. Here we propose and test a computational model of how people perceive and predict these liquid dynamics, based on coarse approximate simulations of fluids as collections of interacting particles. Our model is analogous to a "game engine in the head", drawing on techniques for interactive simulations (as in video games) that optimize for efficiency and natural appearance rather than physical accuracy. In two behavioral experiments, we found that the model accurately captured people's predictions about how liquids flow among complex solid obstacles, and was significantly better than two alternatives based on simple heuristics and deep neural networks. Our model was also able to explain how people's predictions varied as a function of the liquids' properties (e.g., viscosity and stickiness). Together, the model and empirical results extend the recent proposal that human physical scene understanding for the dynamics of rigid, solid objects can be supported by approximate probabilistic simulation, to the more complex and unexplored domain of fluid dynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
- 2023Physion++: Evaluating Physical Scene Understanding that Requires Online Inference of Different Physical Propertiescited by 53
- 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?cited by 46
- 2023Visual cognition in multimodal large language modelscited by 38
- 20233D-IntPhys: Towards More Generalized 3D-grounded Visual Intuitive Physics under Challenging Scenescited by 12
- 2023Understanding Physical Dynamics with Counterfactual World Modelingcited by 11
- 2021Physics perception in sloshing scenes with guaranteed thermodynamic consistencycited by 10
- 2022A Thermodynamics-informed Active Learning Approach to Perception and Reasoning about Fluidscited by 9
- 20233D Shape Perception Integrates Intuitive Physics and Analysis-by-Synthesiscited by 1
- 2025A simulation-heuristics dual-process model for intuitive physicscited by 1
- 2025Learning Particle Dynamics Subject to Rigid Body Manipulations Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Modeling The Object Representations Underlying Human Physical Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Modeling The Object Representations Underlying Human Physical Reasoning12 Feb 2026
- 2025Learning Particle Dynamics Subject to Rigid Body Manipulations Using Graph Neural Networks3 Sep 2025
- 2025A simulation-heuristics dual-process model for intuitive physics13 Apr 2025
- 2023Understanding Physical Dynamics with Counterfactual World Modeling11 Dec 2023
- 2023Visual cognition in multimodal large language models27 Nov 2023
- 2023From task structures to world models: What do LLMs know?6 Oct 2023
- 2023Physion++: Evaluating Physical Scene Understanding that Requires Online Inference of Different Physical Properties27 Jun 2023
- 20233D-IntPhys: Towards More Generalized 3D-grounded Visual Intuitive Physics under Challenging Scenes22 Apr 2023
- 20233D Shape Perception Integrates Intuitive Physics and Analysis-by-Synthesis9 Jan 2023
- 2022A Thermodynamics-informed Active Learning Approach to Perception and Reasoning about Fluids11 Mar 2022
- 2021Physics perception in sloshing scenes with guaranteed thermodynamic consistency24 Jun 2021
- 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machines15 Jun 2021