mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Hardness, Regularization and Numerical Solution

arXiv 2103.06263 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2021cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semi-discrete optimal transport problems, which evaluate the Wasserstein distance between a discrete and a generic (possibly non-discrete) probability measure, are believed to be computationally hard. Even though such problems are ubiquitous in statistics, machine learning and computer vision, however, this perception has not yet received a theoretical justification. To fill this gap, we prove that computing the Wasserstein distance between a discrete probability measure supported on two points and the Lebesgue measure on the standard hypercube is already #P-hard. This insight prompts us to seek approximate solutions for semi-discrete optimal transport problems. We thus perturb the underlying transportation cost with an additive disturbance governed by an ambiguous probability distribution, and we introduce a distributionally robust dual optimal transport problem whose objective function is smoothed with the most adverse disturbance distributions from within a given ambiguity set. We further show that smoothing the dual objective function is equivalent to regularizing the primal objective function, and we identify several ambiguity sets that give rise to several known and new regularization schemes. As a byproduct, we discover an intimate relation between semi-discrete optimal transport problems and discrete choice models traditionally studied in psychology and economics. To solve the regularized optimal transport problems efficiently, we use a stochastic gradient descent algorithm with imprecise stochastic gradient oracles. A new convergence analysis reveals that this algorithm improves the best known convergence guarantee for semi-discrete optimal transport problems with entropic regularizers.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 175 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2021.

Builds on

54 of 175 references.

References · 54

  1. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  2. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,235
  3. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
  4. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 575
  5. 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
  6. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 341
  7. 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 314
  8. 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 291
  9. 2017Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iterationcited by 223
  10. 2016Stochastic Optimization for Large-scale Optimal Transportcited by 189
  11. 2017Image to Image Translation for Domain Adaptationcited by 171
  12. 2015Distributionally Robust Logistic Regressioncited by 126
38 more
  1. 2017Large-Scale Optimal Transport and Mapping Estimationcited by 123
  2. 2018Computational Optimal Transport: Complexity by Accelerated Gradient Descent Is Better Than by Sinkhorn's Algorithmcited by 112
  3. 2013Non-strongly-convex smooth stochastic approximation with convergence rate O(1/n)cited by 111
  4. 2017Smooth and Sparse Optimal Transportcited by 83
  5. 2017Regularization via Mass Transportationcited by 81
  6. 2019On Efficient Optimal Transport: An Analysis of Greedy and Accelerated Mirror Descent Algorithmscited by 62
  7. 2019UniXGrad: A Universal, Adaptive Algorithm with Optimal Guarantees for Constrained Optimizationcited by 56
  8. 2013Regularized Discrete Optimal Transportcited by 54
  9. 2017Multilevel Clustering via Wasserstein Meanscited by 49
  10. 2020A Distributionally Robust Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 43
  11. 2017Optimal Transport for Diffeomorphic Registrationcited by 39
  12. 2017Generalized Self-Concordant Functions: A Recipe for Newton-Type Methodscited by 33
  13. 2013Adaptivity of averaged stochastic gradient descent to local strong convexity for logistic regressioncited by 32
  14. 2019Exponentiated Gradient Meets Gradient Descentcited by 32
  15. 2014Logistic Regression: Tight Bounds for Stochastic and Online Optimizationcited by 31
  16. 2017Structured Optimal Transportcited by 31
  17. 2016Wasserstein Discriminant Analysiscited by 25
  18. 2020A Statistical Test for Probabilistic Fairnesscited by 25
  19. 2016Regularized Optimal Transport and the Rot Mover's Distancecited by 24
  20. 2018An explicit analysis of the entropic penalty in linear programmingcited by 24
  21. 2018On Acceleration with Noise-Corrupted Gradientscited by 20
  22. 2017Quadratically-Regularized Optimal Transport on Graphscited by 19
  23. 2015A Sparse Multi-Scale Algorithm for Dense Optimal Transportcited by 18
  24. 2020Regularized Optimal Transport is Ground Cost Adversarialcited by 17
  25. 2015Principal Geodesic Analysis for Probability Measures under the Optimal Transport Metriccited by 15
  26. 2016Tsallis Regularized Optimal Transport and Ecological Inferencecited by 15
  27. 2018Better and Simpler Error Analysis of the Sinkhorn-Knopp Algorithm for Matrix Scalingcited by 14
  28. 2020Distributionally Robust Local Non-parametric Conditional Estimationcited by 13
  29. 2016A Transportation Lp Distance for Signal Analysiscited by 11
  30. 2017Learning to solve inverse problems using Wasserstein losscited by 11
  31. 2018Towards Optimal Running Times for Optimal Transportcited by 11
  32. 2017Analysis of Biased Stochastic Gradient Descent Using Sequential Semidefinite Programscited by 10
  33. 2018Approximating optimal transport with linear programscited by 10
  34. 2019Entropic regularization of continuous optimal transport problemscited by 10
  35. 2018Greedy stochastic algorithms for entropy-regularized optimal transport problemscited by 9
  36. 2016Generalized Sinkhorn iterations for regularizing inverse problems using optimal mass transportcited by 7
  37. 2016Quantum Optimal Transport for Tensor Field Processingcited by 7
  38. 2017Discovery and visualization of structural biomarkers from MRI using transport-based morphometrycited by 6

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

13 papers.

Sort: