mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attack Strength vs. Detectability Dilemma in Adversarial Machine Learning

arXiv 1802.07295 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2018stat.ML cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As the prevalence and everyday use of machine learning algorithms, along with our reliance on these algorithms grow dramatically, so do the efforts to attack and undermine these algorithms with malicious intent, resulting in a growing interest in adversarial machine learning. A number of approaches have been developed that can render a machine learning algorithm ineffective through poisoning or other types of attacks. Most attack algorithms typically use sophisticated optimization approaches, whose objective function is designed to cause maximum damage with respect to accuracy and performance of the algorithm with respect to some task. In this effort, we show that while such an objective function is indeed brutally effective in causing maximum damage on an embedded feature selection task, it often results in an attack mechanism that can be easily detected with an embarrassingly simple novelty or outlier detection algorithm. We then propose an equally simple yet elegant solution by adding a regularization term to the attacker's objective function that penalizes outlying attack points.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: