On the Computational Complexity of Private High-dimensional Model Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of model selection in a high-dimensional sparse linear regression model under privacy constraints. We propose a differentially private (DP) best subset selection method with strong statistical utility properties by adopting the well-known exponential mechanism for selecting the best model. To achieve computational expediency, we propose an efficient Metropolis-Hastings algorithm and under certain regularity conditions, we establish that it enjoys polynomial mixing time to its stationary distribution. As a result, we also establish both approximate differential privacy and statistical utility for the estimates of the mixed Metropolis-Hastings chain. Finally, we perform some illustrative experiments on simulated data showing that our algorithm can quickly identify active features under reasonable privacy budget constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2023.
Builds on
26 of 92 references.
References · 26
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
- 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 179
- 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 128
- 2015Best Subset Selection via a Modern Optimization Lenscited by 100
- 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
- 2018Revisiting differentially private linear regression: optimal and adaptive prediction & estimation in unbounded domaincited by 61
- 2020Sparse Regression at Scale: Branch-and-Bound rooted in First-Order Optimizationcited by 45
- 2017Sparse High-Dimensional Regression: Exact Scalable Algorithms and Phase Transitionscited by 43
- 2019Practical Differentially Private Top-k Selection with Pay-what-you-get Compositioncited by 39
- 2017Tight Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Selectioncited by 34
- 2016Understanding the Sparse Vector Technique for Differential Privacycited by 27
- 2016Differentially Private Chi-Squared Hypothesis Testing: Goodness of Fit and Independence Testingcited by 24
14 more
- 2023Score Attack: A Lower Bound Technique for Optimal Differentially Private Learningcited by 21
- 2015On the Computational Complexity of High-Dimensional Bayesian Variable Selectioncited by 18
- 2021Oneshot Differentially Private Top-k Selectioncited by 16
- 2021abess: A Fast Best Subset Selection Library in Python and Rcited by 16
- 2021Differentially Private Histograms under Continual Observation: Streaming Selection into the Unknowncited by 14
- 2018Locally Private Hypothesis Testingcited by 11
- 2017Local Private Hypothesis Testing: Chi-Square Testscited by 10
- 2014Differentially Private Algorithms for Empirical Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2016Differentially Private Model Selection with Penalized and Constrained Likelihoodcited by 7
- 2020Best subset selection is robust against design dependencecited by 7
- 2015Private False Discovery Rate Controlcited by 6
- 2016High dimensional thresholded regression and shrinkage effectcited by 6
- 2020A Members First Approach to Enabling LinkedIn's Labor Market Insights at Scalecited by 5
- 2022Majority Vote for Distributed Differentially Private Sign Selectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.