mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unlearning Noise in PINNs: A Selective Pruning Framework for PDE Inverse Problems

arXiv 2602.19967 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a promising framework for solving inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) by integrating observational data and physical constraints in a unified optimization objective. However, the ill-posed nature of PDE inverse problems makes them highly sensitive to noise. Even a small fraction of corrupted observations can distort internal neural representations, severely impairing accuracy and destabilizing training. Motivated by recent advances in machine unlearning and structured network pruning, we propose P-PINN, a selective pruning framework designed to unlearn the influence of corrupted data in a pretrained PINN. Specifically, starting from a PINN trained on the full dataset, P-PINN evaluates a joint residual--data fidelity indicator, a weighted combination of data misfit and PDE residuals, to partition the training set into reliable and corrupted subsets. Next, we introduce a bias-based neuron importance measure that quantifies directional activation discrepancies between the two subsets, identifying neurons whose representations are predominantly driven by corrupted samples. Building on this, an iterative pruning strategy then removes noise-sensitive neurons layer by layer. The resulting pruned network is fine-tuned on the reliable data subject to the original PDE constraints, acting as a lightweight post-processing stage rather than a complete retraining. Numerical experiments on extensive PDE inverse-problem benchmarks demonstrate that P-PINN substantially improves robustness, accuracy, and training stability under noisy conditions, achieving up to a 96.6% reduction in relative error compared with baseline PINNs. These results indicate that activation-level post hoc pruning is a promising mechanism for enhancing the reliability of physics-informed learning in noise-contaminated settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.

Builds on

26 of 55 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  4. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  5. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  6. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  7. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  8. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  9. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  10. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  11. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  12. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
14 more
  1. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
  2. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 305
  3. 2019Physics-Constrained Deep Learning for High-dimensional Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification without Labeled Datacited by 261
  4. 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 233
  5. 2018Bayesian Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks for Surrogate Modeling and Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 199
  6. 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 144
  7. 2020DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning modelscited by 143
  8. 2018Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networks for Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 133
  9. 2024DiffusionPDE: Generative PDE-Solving Under Partial Observationcited by 100
  10. 2020Learn to Forget: Machine Unlearning via Neuron Maskingcited by 56
  11. 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 54
  12. 2019Unsupervised Deep Learning Algorithm for PDE-based Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 31
  13. 2024Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equationscited by 5
  14. 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Robust System Identification of Power Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.