Generalized Grounding Graphs: A Probabilistic Framework for Understanding Grounded Commands
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many task domains require robots to interpret and act upon natural language commands which are given by people and which refer to the robot's physical surroundings. Such interpretation is known variously as the symbol grounding problem, grounded semantics and grounded language acquisition. This problem is challenging because people employ diverse vocabulary and grammar, and because robots have substantial uncertainty about the nature and contents of their surroundings, making it difficult to associate the constitutive language elements (principally noun phrases and spatial relations) of the command text to elements of those surroundings. Symbolic models capture linguistic structure but have not scaled successfully to handle the diverse language produced by untrained users. Existing statistical approaches can better handle diversity, but have not to date modeled complex linguistic structure, limiting achievable accuracy. Recent hybrid approaches have addressed limitations in scaling and complexity, but have not effectively associated linguistic and perceptual features. Our framework, called Generalized Grounding Graphs (G^3), addresses these issues by defining a probabilistic graphical model dynamically according to the linguistic parse structure of a natural language command. This approach scales effectively, handles linguistic diversity, and enables the system to associate parts of a command with the specific objects, places, and events in the external world to which they refer. We show that robots can learn word meanings and use those learned meanings to robustly follow natural language commands produced by untrained users. We demonstrate our approach for both mobility commands and mobile manipulation commands involving a variety of semi-autonomous robotic platforms, including a wheelchair, a micro-air vehicle, a forklift, and the Willow Garage PR2.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Kimera: from SLAM to Spatial Perception with 3D Dynamic Scene Graphscited by 144
- 2021Language Grounding with 3D Objectscited by 43
- 2021Jointly Learning Truth-Conditional Denotations and Groundings using Parallel Attentioncited by 1
- 2023Interaction is all You Need? A Study of Robots Ability to Understand and Executecited by 1
- 2023Interaction is all You Need? A Study of Robots Ability to Understand and Execute13 Nov 2023
- 2021Language Grounding with 3D Objects26 Jul 2021
- 2021Jointly Learning Truth-Conditional Denotations and Groundings using Parallel Attention14 Apr 2021
- 2021Kimera: from SLAM to Spatial Perception with 3D Dynamic Scene Graphs18 Jan 2021