mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepSafe: A Data-driven Approach for Checking Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks

arXiv 1710.00486 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2017cs.NE cs.LG stat.MLcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks have become widely used, obtaining remarkable results in domains such as computer vision, speech recognition, natural language processing, audio recognition, social network filtering, machine translation, and bio-informatics, where they have produced results comparable to human experts. However, these networks can be easily fooled by adversarial perturbations: minimal changes to correctly-classified inputs, that cause the network to mis-classify them. This phenomenon represents a concern for both safety and security, but it is currently unclear how to measure a network's robustness against such perturbations. Existing techniques are limited to checking robustness around a few individual input points, providing only very limited guarantees. We propose a novel approach for automatically identifying safe regions of the input space, within which the network is robust against adversarial perturbations. The approach is data-guided, relying on clustering to identify well-defined geometric regions as candidate safe regions. We then utilize verification techniques to confirm that these regions are safe or to provide counter-examples showing that they are not safe. We also introduce the notion of targeted robustness which, for a given target label and region, ensures that a NN does not map any input in the region to the target label. We evaluated our technique on the MNIST dataset and on a neural network implementation of a controller for the next-generation Airborne Collision Avoidance System for unmanned aircraft (ACAS Xu). For these networks, our approach identified multiple regions which were completely safe as well as some which were only safe for specific labels. It also discovered several adversarial perturbations of interest.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Software Engineering for AI-Based Systems: A Surveycited by 68
  2. 2024Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systemscited by 63
  3. 2021Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)cited by 40
  4. 2021How to Certify Machine Learning Based Safety-critical Systems? A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 36
  5. 2023Formally Explaining Neural Networks within Reactive Systemscited by 24
  6. 2022Verification-Aided Deep Ensemble Selectioncited by 18
  7. 2023Closed-loop Analysis of Vision-based Autonomous Systems: A Case Studycited by 18
  8. 2021Minimal Multi-Layer Modifications of Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
  9. 2023Evaluating the Robustness of Interpretability Methods through Explanation Invariance and Equivariancecited by 13
  10. 2021Key Technology Considerations in Developing and Deploying Machine Learning Models in Clinical Radiology Practicecited by 6
  11. 2023DelBugV: Delta-Debugging Neural Network Verifierscited by 3
  12. 2024A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognitioncited by 2
8 more
  1. 2023Assumption Generation for the Verification of Learning-Enabled Autonomous Systemscited by 1
  2. 2024ARQ: A Mixed-Precision Quantization Framework for Accurate and Certifiably Robust DNNscited by 1
  3. 2022Scalable Whitebox Attacks on Tree-based Modelscited by 0
  4. 2023On the Relationship Between RNN Hidden State Vectors and Semantic Ground Truthcited by 0
  5. 2023Scaling Model Checking for DNN Analysis via State-Space Reduction and Input Segmentation (Extended Version)cited by 0
  6. 2024DeepKnowledge: Generalisation-Driven Deep Learning Testingcited by 0
  7. 2025Clustered Calibration: Representation-Aware Probability Calibration via Learned Subpopulationscited by 0
  8. 2025Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of IoT Intrusion Detection via SHAP-Based Attribution Fingerprintingcited by 0